Which of these are the fastest for running an LLM, assuming the same VRAM:
- Nvidia A100
- Nvidia A40
- Nvidia L40S
- Nvidia GH200
Fastest → slowest for running an LLM (inference/training), ignoring VRAM capacity differences:
agent: ChatGPT 5.2 Auto
For some reason, people seem to be funny about using electric screwdrivers / drills / screw guns while working with wiring devices in the US. Is this an accurate assessment? If so, any idea why? I've seen professional electricians use powered drivers - it saves a ton of time and saves stamina!
Short answer: yes, that perception is accurate in the US, and it’s driven more by code interpretation, safety culture, liability, and training norms than by a hard technical prohibition.
Below is the breakdown.
agent: ChatGPT 5.2 Auto
How does the current Jeep Wagoneer compare to the Grand Wagoneer? The prices are similar, and I'm looking specifically at renting from National / Enterprise. I routinely see Grand Wagoneers there, and my friend rents them on a regular basis. The "Premium SUV AWD" class lists "Jeep Wagoneer L". Pay particular attention to any notes from Flyertalk.
Here’s a practical, rental-focused breakdown of the Jeep Wagoneer vs Grand Wagoneer — especially relevant if you’re seeing “Premium SUV AWD – Jeep Wagoneer L” in National/Enterprise fleets and your friend often gets Grand Wagoneers. I’ll also include FlyerTalk real-world rental impressions where available.
Agent: ChatGPT 5.2 Pro Thinking
Being an experienced software and electrical engineer who also has a ton of experience on the project management, specification, and manual writing side, is it likely that I'm getting better "vibe coding" results than usual considering that I write extremely detailed and thorough specs that break things down into a way that a human could easily complete the various coding tasks?
Yes—very likely.
“Vibe coding” quality is heavily driven by the quality of the problem formulation. If you routinely write specs that a competent human could execute with minimal ambiguity, you’re feeding the model the same kind of structure it needs to produce coherent code: clear intent, constraints, interfaces, and acceptance criteria. Your software + electrical engineering background plus PM/spec/manual-writing experience also tends to reduce two common failure modes: missing requirements and vague definitions.
Do Claude Code or Codex support a way to pass in a very long message from a file? For example, I want to provide the instructions to start building the application. It's several paragraphs, so I want to write it with vim, save it, then tell Claude or Codex to read the file and follow the instructions.
Does this work? Can you find anything online? Ideally try to cover both tools.
Approaches that seem reasonable are:
I'm open to other options. Please try to provide commentary for both tools, as we use both of them at my firm. Thanks for your help, you're the best.
| <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> | |
| <Preset isAutoSaved="true" xmlns="urn:schemas-nliteos-com:pn.v1"> | |
| <Date>11/21/2025 12:42:09</Date> | |
| <AppInfo> | |
| <Version>2025.8.10552</Version> | |
| <Licensed>Yes</Licensed> | |
| <Protections>Yes</Protections> | |
| <Host>Windows 10 EnterpriseS 21H2 x64 - 10.0.19044.6575 (en-US)</Host> | |
| </AppInfo> | |
| <ImageInfo> |
| <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> | |
| <Preset isAutoSaved="true" xmlns="urn:schemas-nliteos-com:pn.v1"> | |
| <Date>09/12/2022 13:25:18</Date> | |
| <AppInfo> | |
| <Version>2.3.8.8890</Version> | |
| <Licensed>No</Licensed> | |
| <Protections>Yes</Protections> | |
| <Host>Windows Server 2022 Standard x64 - 10.0.20348.405 (en-US)</Host> | |
| </AppInfo> | |
| <ImageInfo> |
The following will be removed
setup-intefaces -r and setup-apkrepos to set something more specifically. Optionally, use set a root password setup-sshd to set up remote console.setup-interfaces -ra
setup-apkrepos -1c
echo 'root:9' | chpasswd