Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@trxcllnt
trxcllnt / config.yml
Created June 7, 2022 02:35
basic `clangd` C/C++/CUDA config
# Apply this config conditionally to all C files
If:
PathMatch: .*\.(c|h)$
CompileFlags:
Compiler: /usr/bin/gcc
---
# Apply this config conditionally to all C++ files
If:
@carceneaux
carceneaux / remove_gitlab_artifacts.sh
Last active August 22, 2025 14:55
Script for removing GitLab Job Artifacts.
#!/bin/bash
#
# Written by Chris Arceneaux
# GitHub: https://github.com/carceneaux
# Email: carcenea@gmail.com
# Website: http://arsano.ninja
#
# Note: This code is a stop-gap to erase Job Artifacts for a project. I HIGHLY recommend you leverage
# "artifacts:expire_in" in your .gitlab-ci.yml
#
@mbinna
mbinna / effective_modern_cmake.md
Last active June 2, 2026 09:44
Effective Modern CMake

Effective Modern CMake

Getting Started

For a brief user-level introduction to CMake, watch C++ Weekly, Episode 78, Intro to CMake by Jason Turner. LLVM’s CMake Primer provides a good high-level introduction to the CMake syntax. Go read it now.

After that, watch Mathieu Ropert’s CppCon 2017 talk Using Modern CMake Patterns to Enforce a Good Modular Design (slides). It provides a thorough explanation of what modern CMake is and why it is so much better than “old school” CMake. The modular design ideas in this talk are based on the book [Large-Scale C++ Software Design](https://www.amazon.de/Large-Scale-Soft

@chitchcock
chitchcock / 20111011_SteveYeggeGooglePlatformRant.md
Created October 12, 2011 15:53
Stevey's Google Platforms Rant

Stevey's Google Platforms Rant

I was at Amazon for about six and a half years, and now I've been at Google for that long. One thing that struck me immediately about the two companies -- an impression that has been reinforced almost daily -- is that Amazon does everything wrong, and Google does everything right. Sure, it's a sweeping generalization, but a surprisingly accurate one. It's pretty crazy. There are probably a hundred or even two hundred different ways you can compare the two companies, and Google is superior in all but three of them, if I recall correctly. I actually did a spreadsheet at one point but Legal wouldn't let me show it to anyone, even though recruiting loved it.

I mean, just to give you a very brief taste: Amazon's recruiting process is fundamentally flawed by having teams hire for themselves, so their hiring bar is incredibly inconsistent across teams, despite various efforts they've made to level it out. And their operations are a mess; they don't real