This is inspired by A half-hour to learn Rust and Zig in 30 minutes.
Your first Go program as a classical "Hello World" is pretty simple:
First we create a workspace for our project:
This is inspired by A half-hour to learn Rust and Zig in 30 minutes.
Your first Go program as a classical "Hello World" is pretty simple:
First we create a workspace for our project:
by Tatiana Mac
Last updated 14 April 2021
As speaking comes with immense privilege, I have crafted a speaker rider to set expectations and boundaries around my engagement. I am grateful to all the conference organisers who have brilliantly hosted me. I would love to continue to exercise this privilege to speak at conferences, and use this privilege to make the landscape more accessible and beneficial to tech's most historically excluded and marginalised communities.
😫 I provide a lot of explanations for those of you who never had to consider these things. Most thoughtful conferences I've attended check most of these boxes intrinsically, particularly when conference runners are experienced speakers. They get it.
Recently CSS has got a lot of negativity. But I would like to defend it and show, that with good naming convention CSS works pretty well.
My 3 developers team has just developed React.js application with 7668
lines of CSS (and just 2 !important
).
During one year of development we had 0 issues with CSS. No refactoring typos, no style leaks, no performance problems, possibly, it is the most stable part of our application.
Here are main principles we use to write CSS for modern (IE11+) browsers:
Several years ago I got curious about how css worked at scale. When I first started out, there weren’t nearly as many learning resources as there are now. CSS zen garden was amazing, at the time it showed how much you could change a design without altering the html.
In the beginning, that’s what people sold me as a feature. By writing css, you could make a change one place and have it propagate everywhere. In principle this sounds pretty good. I’m lazy so I like doing things one time. But eleven years later, my experience on both large and small teams is that this is the most terrifying thing about css.
https://twitter.com/thomasfuchs/status/493790680397803521
In the past few years a lot of very smart people have been thinking more about CSS and this has lead to some fascinating discussions around how to build ‘scalable’ ui and how that relates to CSS. When I first started to think about scalability I naturally started to read every blog post and watch every tech talk I could get
Picking the right architecture = Picking the right battles + Managing trade-offs
Hello, visitors! If you want an updated version of this styleguide in repo form with tons of real-life examples… check out Trellisheets! https://github.com/trello/trellisheets
“I perfectly understand our CSS. I never have any issues with cascading rules. I never have to use !important
or inline styles. Even though somebody else wrote this bit of CSS, I know exactly how it works and how to extend it. Fixes are easy! I have a hard time breaking our CSS. I know exactly where to put new CSS. We use all of our CSS and it’s pretty small overall. When I delete a template, I know the exact corresponding CSS file and I can delete it all at once. Nothing gets left behind.”
You often hear updog saying stuff like this. Who’s updog? Not much, who is up with you?
Rich Hickey • 3 years ago
Sorry, I have to disagree with the entire premise here.
A wide variety of experiences might lead to well-roundedness, but not to greatness, nor even goodness. By constantly switching from one thing to another you are always reaching above your comfort zone, yes, but doing so by resetting your skill and knowledge level to zero.
Mastery comes from a combination of at least several of the following: