| name old time/op new time/op delta | |
| BinaryTree17 5.44s ± 2% 3.27s ± 2% -39.90% (p=0.000 n=20+19) | |
| Fannkuch11 4.95s ± 2% 2.68s ± 2% -45.87% (p=0.000 n=20+20) | |
| FmtFprintfEmpty 142ns ± 2% 49ns ± 3% -65.39% (p=0.000 n=20+18) | |
| FmtFprintfFloat 765ns ± 2% 260ns ± 2% -66.02% (p=0.000 n=20+20) | |
| FmtFprintfInt 341ns ± 2% 95ns ± 2% -72.08% (p=0.000 n=19+20) | |
| FmtFprintfIntInt 554ns ± 2% 150ns ± 1% -72.95% (p=0.000 n=20+19) | |
| FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 497ns ± 3% 178ns ± 3% -64.12% (p=0.000 n=20+20) | |
| FmtFprintfString 466ns ± 2% 86ns ± 3% -81.54% (p=0.000 n=20+20) | |
| FmtManyArgs 2.23µs ± 2% 0.59µs ± 1% -73.46% (p=0.000 n=20+17) |
| # This is a GCR vanity domain. It aliases our domain to a specific | |
| # bucket in GCR. | |
| # e.g.`docker pull gcr.example.com/foobar` -> gcr.io/my_bucket/foobar | |
| server { | |
| server_name gcr.example.com; | |
| listen 80; | |
| listen 443 ssl; | |
| location = /v2/ { | |
| # If we redirect this, it can detect as unauthorized, but the token |
| #Packet sniffer in python for Linux | |
| #Sniffs only incoming TCP packet | |
| import socket, sys | |
| from struct import * | |
| #create an INET, STREAMing socket | |
| try: | |
| s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_RAW, socket.IPPROTO_TCP) | |
| except socket.error , msg: |
Herewith is an example of encoding to and from base64 using OpenSSL's C library. Code presented here is both binary safe, and portable (i.e. it should work on any Posix compliant system e.g. FreeBSD and Linux).
The MIT License (MIT)
Copyright (c) 2013 Barry Steyn
I was at Amazon for about six and a half years, and now I've been at Google for that long. One thing that struck me immediately about the two companies -- an impression that has been reinforced almost daily -- is that Amazon does everything wrong, and Google does everything right. Sure, it's a sweeping generalization, but a surprisingly accurate one. It's pretty crazy. There are probably a hundred or even two hundred different ways you can compare the two companies, and Google is superior in all but three of them, if I recall
