#Users
- User object
{
id: integer
username: string
email: string
created_at: datetime(iso 8601)
updated_at: datetime(iso 8601)
}
#Users
{
id: integer
username: string
email: string
created_at: datetime(iso 8601)
updated_at: datetime(iso 8601)
}
Picking the right architecture = Picking the right battles + Managing trade-offs
(Items in bold indicate possible concerns)
Keycloak | WSO2 Identity Server | Gluu | CAS | OpenAM | Shibboleth IdP | LemonLDAP::NG | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OpenID Connect/OAuth support | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | third-party | yes |
Multi-factor authentication | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
Admin UI | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | yes |
OpenJDK support | yes | yes | no³ | yes | yes | **[partial](https://wiki.shibboleth.net/confluence/display/IDP30/SystemRequ |
One of the best ways to reduce complexity (read: stress) in web development is to minimize the differences between your development and production environments. After being frustrated by attempts to unify the approach to SSL on my local machine and in production, I searched for a workflow that would make the protocol invisible to me between all environments.
Most workflows make the following compromises:
Use HTTPS in production but HTTP locally. This is annoying because it makes the environments inconsistent, and the protocol choices leak up into the stack. For example, your web application needs to understand the underlying protocol when using the secure
flag for cookies. If you don't get this right, your HTTP development server won't be able to read the cookies it writes, or worse, your HTTPS production server could pass sensitive cookies over an insecure connection.
Use production SSL certificates locally. This is annoying
One of the best ways to reduce complexity (read: stress) in web development is to minimize the differences between your development and production environments. After being frustrated by attempts to unify the approach to SSL on my local machine and in production, I searched for a workflow that would make the protocol invisible to me between all environments.
Most workflows make the following compromises:
Use HTTPS in production but HTTP locally. This is annoying because it makes the environments inconsistent, and the protocol choices leak up into the stack. For example, your web application needs to understand the underlying protocol when using the secure
flag for cookies. If you don't get this right, your HTTP development server won't be able to read the cookies it writes, or worse, your HTTPS production server could pass sensitive cookies over an insecure connection.
Use production SSL certificates locally. This is annoying
This procedure explains how to install MySQL using Homebrew on macOS Sierra 10.12
$ /usr/bin/ruby -e "$(curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Homebrew/install/master/install)"
At this time of writing, Homebrew has MySQL version 5.7.15 as default formulae in its main repository :
This procedure explains how to install MySQL using Homebrew on macOS Sierra 10.12
$ /usr/bin/ruby -e "$(curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Homebrew/install/master/install)"
At this time of writing, Homebrew has MySQL version 5.7.15 as default formulae in its main repository :