# Diagnostic sonde Atlas Bolivie
Les ping depuis la sonde Atlas 23967 (https://atlas.ripe.net/probes/23967/) avec des longs paquets n'arrivent pas. On regarde une route, par exemple ver mamot.fr, depuis un ordinateur situé dans le même réseau local que la sonde (chez moi) :
$ traceroute -A mamot.fr
traceroute to mamot.fr (185.34.33.7), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) [*] 4.432 ms 6.156 ms 8.457 ms
2 192.168.101.101 (192.168.101.101) [*] 10.667 ms 23.265 ms 25.142 ms
3 190.129.248.130 (190.129.248.130) [AS6568] 25.137 ms 25.130 ms 28.985 ms
4 190.129.248.135 (190.129.248.135) [AS6568] 75.856 ms 190.129.248.128 (190.129.248.128) [AS6568] 131.814 ms 295.012 ms
5 * 200.87.253.37 (200.87.253.37) [AS6568] 576.935 ms 200.87.253.35 (200.87.253.35) [AS6568] 577.764 ms
6 84.16.9.116 (84.16.9.116) [AS12956] 583.218 ms 10.239 ms 12.044 ms
7 5.53.3.55 (5.53.3.55) [*] 85.992 ms 5.53.3.61 (5.53.3.61) [*] 113.979 ms 94.142.99.107 (94.142.99.107) [*] 115.325 ms
8 94.142.98.48 (94.142.98.48) [*] 124.999 ms 94.142.125.45 (94.142.125.45) [*] 145.962 ms 213.140.36.66 (213.140.36.66) [AS12956] 134.918 ms
9 telia-ae10-0-grtdaleq2.net.telefonicaglobalsolutions.com (213.140.52.105) [AS12956] 125.876 ms 131.662 ms 184.188 ms
10 nyk-bb3-link.telia.net (213.155.130.206) [AS1299] 243.825 ms nyk-bb4-link.telia.net (213.155.134.254) [AS1299] 333.233 ms nyk-bb4-link.telia.net (213.155.130.66) [AS1299] 336.904 ms
11 prs-bb3-link.telia.net (62.115.121.27) [AS1299] 409.860 ms nyk-bb4-link.telia.net (213.155.137.28) [AS1299] 346.046 ms nyk-bb3-link.telia.net (213.155.137.50) [AS1299] 344.461 ms
12 27.121.115.62.in-addr.arpa (62.115.121.27) [AS1299] 400.442 ms prs-bb2-link.telia.net (80.91.251.101) [AS1299] 283.014 ms prs-b8-link.telia.net (62.115.118.61) [AS1299] 229.236 ms
13 nerim-ic-305766-prs-b8.c.telia.net (213.155.129.254) [AS1299] 224.683 ms prs-b8-link.telia.net (62.115.138.139) [AS1299] 219.407 ms 254.129.155.213.in-addr.arpa (213.155.129.254) [AS1299] 225.082 ms
14 xe0-0-0.80.edg-ptn-1.nerim.net (194.79.137.158) [AS13193] 213.301 ms 228.095 ms 215.269 ms
15 xe0-0-3-85.edg-ptn-2.nerim.net (194.79.137.154) [AS13193] 232.666 ms 236.132 ms 233.153 ms
16 154.137.79.194.in-addr.arpa (194.79.137.154) [AS13193] 222.872 ms edg-vty-1-grt.nerim.net (194.79.137.225) [AS13193] 228.634 ms 154.137.79.194.in-addr.arpa (194.79.137.154) [AS13193] 223.517 ms
17 225.137.79.194.in-addr.arpa (194.79.137.225) [AS13193] 221.576 ms cesare.octopuce.fr (91.194.60.223) [AS28855/AS39389] 224.097 ms 219.136 ms
18 lqdn-gw-out.octopuce.fr (91.194.60.220) [AS28855/AS39389] 206.538 ms 207.940 ms 210.200 ms
19 iota.lqdn.fr (185.34.33.7) [AS28855/AS39389] 209.130 ms * *
On essaye ping vers le premier relai (192.168.1.1
, le routeur F660 de la marque ZTE, fourni par le FAI Entel - connexion par fibre optique), avec des paquets de taille 1000 et 2000: on perd déjà des paquets avec la taille 2000.
$ ping -s 2000 192.168.1.1
PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 2000(2028) bytes of data.
2008 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=68.0 ms
2008 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=42.4 ms
2008 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=50.5 ms
2008 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=1771 ms
2008 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=753 ms
2008 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=15.1 ms
2008 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=198 ms
^C
--- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics ---
9 packets transmitted, 7 received, 22% packet loss, time 8056ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 15.135/414.150/1771.103/603.856 ms, pipe 2
$ ping -s 1000 192.168.1.1
PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 1000(1028) bytes of data.
1008 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=5.52 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=14.2 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=58.3 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=3.92 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=3.68 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=5.60 ms
^C
--- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 6 received, 0% packet loss, time 5007ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 3.682/15.230/58.380/19.626 ms
On essaye maintenant le ping avec le deuxième relai (192.168.101.101
, j'imagine que c'est un routeur commun aux connexions de fibre optique du quartier - ses ports ouverts sont 1999 2399 3325 3998 5850 7627 24444 51103
, je ne sais pas si ça aide à trouver ce que c'est), et là : il ne répond à aucun des ping avec une taille de paquets de 2000 !
$ ping -s 2000 192.168.101.101
PING 192.168.101.101 (192.168.101.101) 2000(2028) bytes of data.
^C
--- 192.168.101.101 ping statistics ---
11 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 10237ms
$ ping -s 1000 192.168.101.101
PING 192.168.101.101 (192.168.101.101) 1000(1028) bytes of data.
1008 bytes from 192.168.101.101: icmp_seq=1 ttl=254 time=13.9 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.101.101: icmp_seq=2 ttl=254 time=7.67 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.101.101: icmp_seq=3 ttl=254 time=10.4 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.101.101: icmp_seq=4 ttl=254 time=23.3 ms
^C
--- 192.168.101.101 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3004ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 7.672/13.847/23.324/5.913 ms
Confirmé avec traceroute
$ sudo traceroute -I -A 192.168.101.101 200
traceroute to 192.168.101.101 (192.168.101.101), 30 hops max, 200 byte packets
1 * * 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) [*] 948.827 ms
2 192.168.101.101 (192.168.101.101) [*] 1295.784 ms * 1647.134 ms
$ sudo traceroute -I -A 192.168.101.101 2000
traceroute to 192.168.101.101 (192.168.101.101), 30 hops max, 2000 byte packets
1 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) [*] 12.775 ms 21.254 ms 25.812 ms
2 * * *
3 * * *
4 * * *
5 * * *
6 * * *
7 * * *
8 * * *
9 * * *
10 * * *
11 * * *
12 * * *
13 * * *
14 * * *
15 * * *
16 * * *
17 * * *
18 * * *
19 * * *
20 * * *
21 * * *
22 * * *
23 * * *
24 * * *
25 * * *
26 * * *
27 * * *
28 * * *
29 * * *
30 * * *
Finalement, en regardant la configuration de mon routeur (http://192.168.1.1 - WAN Connection), il semble que le relai est l'IP 190.129.186.50, mais celle-ci n'apparait pas dans le traceroute... ça, je ne comprends pas.