Created
February 9, 2012 12:55
-
-
Save shouichi/1779820 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
*.aux | |
*.dvi | |
*.log | |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
RM=rm -f | |
LATEX=latex | |
DVIPDFMX=dvipdfmx | |
DETEX=detex | |
SOURCES=report3.tex | |
DVI=$(SOURCES:.tex=.dvi) | |
PDF=$(SOURCES:.tex=.pdf) | |
all: pdf | |
gnome-open $(PDF) | |
dvi: $(DVI) | |
pdf: $(PDF) | |
.SUFFIXES: | |
.SUFFIXES: .tex .dvi .pdf | |
.tex.dvi: | |
$(LATEX) $< | |
$(LATEX) $< | |
.dvi.pdf: | |
$(DVIPDFMX) $< | |
$(DVIPDFMX) $< | |
.PHONY: wc | |
wc: | |
$(DETEX) $(SOURCES) | wc | |
.PHONY: clean | |
clean: | |
$(RM) *.dvi *.pdf *.aux *.log |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
\documentclass[a4paper]{article} | |
\usepackage{graphicx} | |
\usepackage{url} | |
\usepackage{amsmath, amssymb} | |
\title{Formal Method Report III: Formal Verification and Common Criteria} | |
\author{Kamiya Shouichi} | |
\date{February 10, 2012} | |
\begin{document} | |
\maketitle | |
\section*{Introduction} | |
Nowadays, more and more things were digitized. For example, eBook becomes | |
popular recentyl due to the release of iBook from Apple Inc. Space development | |
is one of the most seriouse area and they also rely on computers. Moreover, | |
even bank accounts are digitized and managed by computers. So it is obviously | |
important to ensure the quality of softwares somehow, especially in those | |
serious areas (e.g. space development, banking). | |
Common Criteria is an international standard for computer security certification | |
and it can guarantee the certain quality of softwares.\cite{wikipedia:cc} In | |
Common Criteria Evaluation Assurance Level 7 which is most restrict level | |
requires formal verification and we can see the importance of formal | |
verification. | |
By using formal verification, we can ensure the quality of softwares by proving | |
or disproving the correctness of the intended algorithms. It is expected that | |
formal verification can be applied to serious areas such as space develpment. | |
In fact NASA is using formal verification.\cite{nasa} | |
\section*{Pros and Cons of Formal Verification} | |
Following things are thought to be pros of formal verification.\cite{portal} | |
\begin{list}{}{} | |
\item We can remove ambiguity from early development phase and understand | |
software more. That is much cost in early phase of development and try to | |
reduce the cost of fixing bugs in latter development phase. | |
\item We can prove or disprove the certain property of the system based on | |
mathematical theory when the system is very complex or high reliability is | |
required. | |
\end{list} | |
Following things are thought to be cons of formal verification.\cite{portal} | |
\begin{list}{}{} | |
\item Proving or disproving requires requires high cost and consumes much time. | |
\item It is not still widely adopted in industry and not so many documents are | |
available. | |
\item Not so many people are familiar with formal verification method. | |
\end{list} | |
\section*{Discussion} | |
As we saw in above, formal verification costs a lot of money and time. So it is | |
not a good idea to use it for products which life cycle is relatively short such | |
as web development. In web development, requirements are often changes and it is | |
important to develop and release products. | |
On the other hand, it is very helpful to use formal verification for systems | |
where very high reliability is required such as space development. It is hard | |
and cost a lot of money and time to fix bugs after launching artificial | |
satelites. | |
By the way, Common Criteria seems to be losing its popularity unfortunately, | |
because its sponsors are decreasing year by year.\cite{iccc:2005,iccc:2010, | |
iccc:2011} In reality, it might cost too much money and time to satisfy Common | |
Criteria for most of the companies. So more practical version of standard or | |
formal verification tool might be needed. | |
\section*{Conclusion} | |
Formal verification method can be applied to certain field but not every. To | |
extend applicable field, formal verification need to be more practical. | |
\begin{thebibliography}{0} | |
\bibitem{wikipedia:cc} | |
\emph{Common Criteria} | |
\url{http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Criteria} | |
\bibitem{wikipedia:eal} | |
\emph{Evaluation Assurance Level} | |
\url{http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evaluation_Assurance_Level} | |
\bibitem{iccc:2005} | |
\emph{ICCC 2005} | |
\url{http://www.ipa.go.jp/event/iccc2005/english/index.html} | |
\bibitem{iccc:2010} | |
\emph{ICCC 2010} | |
\url{http://www.11iccc.org.tr/} | |
\bibitem{iccc:2011} | |
\emph{ICCC 2011} | |
\url{http://12iccc.cybersecurity.my/sponsor.html} | |
\bibitem{portal} | |
\emph{Formal Methods User Group} | |
\url{http://fmug.grace-center.jp/taxonomy/term/30} | |
\bibitem{nasa} | |
\emph{NFM 2012 • 4th NASA FORMAL METHODS SYMPOSIUM} | |
\url{http://shemesh.larc.nasa.gov/nfm2012/} | |
\bibitem{gemalto} | |
\emph{About the world-first smart card certificate with EAL7 formal assurances} | |
\url{http://www.commoncriteriaportal.org/iccc/9iccc/pdf/B2404.pdf} | |
\end{thebibliography} | |
\end{document} |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment