Generated on: 2025-07-16 12:43:52
quantum computing
Found 5 relevant papers:
# Decoding Consumer Preferences Using Attention-Based Language Models | |
- Authors: Joshua Foster, Fredrik Odegaard | |
- Summary: This paper proposes a new method for demand estimation using attention-based language models, specifically an encoder-only language model trained in two stages. It analyzes natural language descriptions of used cars for market demand primitives. The model projects language encodings into the parameter space of a structural model and validates its counterfactual analysis capability on unique zero-shot auction instances. | |
- Category: econ.EM | |
- Published: 2025-07-23 | |
- URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.17564v1 | |
# DistrAttention: An Efficient and Flexible Self-Attention Mechanism on Modern GPUs |
# Natural Language Processing (NLP) | |
This gist summarizes recent research papers related to Natural Language Processing (NLP) from arXiv. | |
## Summary of Work | |
1. **Decoding Consumer Preferences Using Attention-Based Language Models** | |
- Proposes a demand estimation method using attention-based language models for analyzing natural language descriptions of used cars to estimate market demand. | |
2. **DistrAttention: An Efficient and Flexible Self-Attention Mechanism on Modern GPUs** |
# Recent Research Papers on Machine Learning | |
## Summary of Work | |
1. **Hierarchical Rectified Flow Matching with Mini-Batch Couplings**: Introduces a hierarchical flow matching model to better capture multi-modality in velocity fields for generative modeling, with benefits shown in synthetic and imaging data. | |
2. **VisionThink: Smart and Efficient Vision Language Model via Reinforcement Learning**: Proposes VisionThink, a dynamic approach to visual token compression in vision-language models using reinforcement learning to optimize token use based on task complexity. | |
3. **Latent Policy Steering with Embodiment-Agnostic Pretrained World Models**: Focuses on reducing data collection for visuomotor policies by leveraging multi-embodiment datasets using optic flow and World Models, improving policy performance. |
from mirascope import llm, Messages | |
from mirascope.mcp import sse_client | |
import lilypad | |
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field, ValidationError | |
from tenacity import retry, stop_after_attempt | |
from fastmcp import FastMCP | |
from dotenv import load_dotenv | |
import asyncio | |
load_dotenv() |
# /// script | |
# requires-python = ">=3.11" | |
# dependencies = [ | |
# "humanlayer==0.7.9", | |
# "pydantic==2.11.5", | |
# ] | |
# /// | |
import humanlayer | |
from datetime import date |
"""Script for generating queries for a recipe search engine. | |
This script can be used to generate synthetic queries for a recipe search engine. | |
Following best practices from Hamel and Shreya's AI Evals course, we: | |
- Generate a set of dimensions that can be used to generate queries; these are attributes that significantly change what the query is about or how it is written. | |
- For each set of attributes ("Dimensions") we generate a query that matches those attributes. | |
To ensure that the synthetic generation is better aligned, we first try handwriting the queries using the --manual flag. | |
This gives us labeled examples to use few shot in our synthetic generation. |
# Agents can fail in fantastic ways, and stacktraces are unfortunately not always helpful enough. | |
# Fortunately, Pydantic AI agents keep track of messages, so as long as you save them you can view them and aid your debugging! | |
# This gist shows a simple `try_run` implementation which will log out the messages on error. | |
# You can imagine any number of things to do with the messages: send to logfire, store in a database, write to file, etc | |
# Pro tip: these form a helpful subset of data input/outputs to help refine your agent! Taking some time to store them | |
# appropriately for review (and possibly fine tuning / use in prompts / etc in the future) will pay off!! | |
These are examples where your agent actually failed! | |
from __future__ import annotations | |
import asyncio |
# I found it surprising that tools had to return a JSON-like type; but didn't support Pydantic BaseModels! | |
# Perhaps that's by design. However, this simple decorator allows you to implement tools with structured output | |
# and slap a simple decorator to convert to JSON which the Pydantic AI tool format accepts. | |
# This is a minimal example | |
from __future__ import annotations | |
import asyncio | |
from collections.abc import Coroutine | |
from dataclasses import dataclass |
# This is a modification of the Pydantic AI weather example from: | |
# https://ai.pydantic.dev/examples/weather-agent/ | |
# It has been modified to add rate limiting, since the required APIs have tiny rate limits! | |
# I am using asynciolimiter: uv add asynciolimiter with a custom decorator to apply the rate limits | |
# Let me know if you know of a better/cleaner way! | |
# This means we can easily rate limit tools! | |
from __future__ import annotations as _annotations |