ES6 template string parser

readme.md

import parseTpl from './parse-es6-template';

parseTpl('${name} is now master of the ${galaxy}', { 
  name: 'John',
  galaxy: 'Milky Way',
});

parse-es6-template.js

function get(path, obj, fb = `$\{${path}}`) {
  return path.split('.').reduce((res, key) => res[key] || fb, obj);
}

function parseTpl(template, map, fallback) {
  return template.replace(/\$\{.+?}/g, (match) => {
    const path = match.substr(2, match.length - 3).trim();
    return get(path, map, fallback);
  });
}

export default parseTpl;

Hey there, as per:

interpolate('Errors are kept to minimum: ${x.o.x.o.x.o.x.o.x.o.x.o.x.o}')
//> Errors are kept to minimum: ${x.o.x.o.x.o.x.o.x.o.x.o.x.o}

I wanted to print out references to missing variables, as opposed to cause trouble, I just wanted this little function to work without causing any issues.

I can see that you don't like that and would probably prefer for ${true}x to result in x, personally I hate that, because your request for the value of .true is lost, and you may not notice that your data object does not contain .true = "Interpolate with this."

BEFORE I tell you what you want to hear, let me make a note about the Nullish Coalescing Operator (??), which you can read about here: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/Nullish_coalescing_operator

OK, so what is SUPER UNCLEAR about the code, is the tail end with the ?? that is just an OR or what you are used to seeing as ||, except || had a problem if the reference to .test was 0, then the function would see that as a miss, and return ${true} which is a way of signalling that interpolation failed.

SO, with || instead of ?? all works OK...
interpolate('${true}x ${hello}', {hello:'world', true:'I think therefore I am!'})
//> "I think therefore I am!x world"

BUT, if true was 0 (zero or "falsey") then interpolate would act as if true had no value, meaning it would return the ${true}:
interpolate('${true}x ${hello}', {hello:'world', true:0})
//> "${true}x world"

NOW, with ?? zero is treated as truthy, becasue it is not undefined, it is just 0
interpolate('${true}x ${hello}', {hello:'world', true:0})
//> "0x world"

See? that is what ?? does, it allows me to interpolate your data requests with falsey variables.

I understand your question (but I am long-winded), here is what you were looking for:

USE THIS IF YOU DON'T WANT TO SEE ${true}:

function interpolate(t, c){return t.replace(/\${([^}]+)}/g,(m,p)=>p.split('.').reduce((a,f)=>a?a[f]:undefined,c)??'');}

I replaced m with '', right at the end, m, is the match! In your case ${true}, and I was just returning it so that you see it is unmatched, and then throw in .true = 'something' but what you expect is for ${true} to be interpolated with nothing or '', and that is what the code above does, ho ho.

Here is a slightly more expanded example:
interpolate('${true}x ${hello} ${C0FFEE}', {hello:'world', C0FFEE:0, true:undefined})
//> "x world 0"

Note how ${true} was understood, but since it is undefined, and you don't want to see it again, it has been removed now.
And note how ${C0FFEE} which is 0 actually does get interpolated because of the Nullish Coalescing Operator (as opposed to the ol' ||)
And that ${hello} works just as expected.

To use your example:
interpolate('${true}x',{a:'hovercraft'})
//> "x"

you just get x.

Ps.
And in the end I want to add that:

interpolate('Errors are kept to minimum: ${x.o.x.o.x.o.x.o.x.o.x.o.x.o}')
//> Errors are kept to minimum: ${x.o.x.o.x.o.x.o.x.o.x.o.x.o}

has changed behaviour now, it returns:
//> "Errors are kept to minimum: "

See it is no onger alerting you that ${x.o.x.o.x.o.x.o.x.o.x.o.x.o} was not resolved, or in your case it is no longer alerting you that ${true} was not resolved.

Ps. Ps.
I understand you put in true to mess with my function, but it is interpreted as as an object property, it is a name, and not a value. It happends here: p.split('.').reduce((a,f)=>a?a[f]:undefined,c) p is a string with the value "true" as matched by my regular expression /${([^}]+)}/

Thank You @makmav for your interest in my fantastic code,
I hope this message finds you well,

Now let us take a moment of serenity silence, and admire our new
Nullish Coalescing Operator because it is amazing, I am so excited to be evaluating falseys as true whoo hooo!!!

Ps. Ps. Ps.
🐈
${true}x -> x