Use async module to run multiple GETs simultaneously and call a function when they are all back

gistfile1.js

var urls = ['http://one.com', 'http://two.com'],
    results = [];

async.forEach(urls, function(url, done) {
    $.get(url, function(data) {
        results.push(data);
        done();
    });
}, function(err) {
    console.dir(results); // all results are back
});

I think you can use async.map

var urls = ['http://one.com', 'http://two.com'];

async.forEach(urls, $.get, function(err, results) {
    console.dir(results); // all results are back
});

Apologies if this is slightly wrong, haven't got an environment handy atm.

Hi Julian. That doesn't quite work because the async callback function looks like function(err) {...} and the $.get callback is function(data) {...}, so the async callback thinks it has failed as soon as the first $.get comes back with data!

Serves me right for not testing it thoroughly... :)

Anyway, this definitely does work

<script src='https://raw.github.com/caolan/async/master/lib/async.js'></script>
<script src='http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.7.1/jquery.min.js'></script>
<script>
$(function() {
  var jQueryToAsync = function(f) {
    return function(data, c) {
      var p = f(data);
      p.success(function(d) {
        return c(null, d);
      });
      p.error(function(e) {
        return c(e);
      });
    }
  };
  var urls = ['x.html', '/x.html'];
  return async.map(urls, jQueryToAsync($.get), function(e, data) {
    if (e) return console.error(e);
    console.log(data);
  });
});
</script>

I prefer this because the problem of adapting jQuery to async is isolated to one function, and you haven't got a side-effect from the result/done work. Admittedly, it's slightly longer, but the jQueryToAsync routine should work for any similar jQuery function.

Needless to say, this code is vastly easier on the eye in CoffeeScript. :)