Last active
December 23, 2015 10:09
-
-
Save thecodejack/6619533 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
My Experiments with prototype.js
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
//create a object | |
var Person = {name:'Adi'}; | |
//create another empty object | |
var apk = {}; | |
apk.__proto__ === apk.prototype | |
//returns false | |
//just FYI prototype is available for functions | |
//but | |
Person.isPrototypeOf(apk) | |
//returns true. weird huh. Its coz __proto__ also acts as prototype object and also both are not same | |
//set Person as __proto__ object to apk | |
apk.__proto__ = Person | |
console.log(apk.name); | |
//returns 'Adi' | |
//change name property of apk | |
apk.name = 'ASK' | |
Person.name | |
//returns "Adi" | |
//change name property of __proto__ | |
apk.__proto__.name = 'ASK' | |
Person.name | |
//returns "ASK" |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
function Person(){console.log('In Person')}; | |
console.log(Person.prototype); | |
//returns Person {} | |
console.log(Person.__proto__); | |
//returns function Empty() {} | |
console.log(Person.__proto__ === Person.prototype); | |
//returns false | |
Person.prototype.fname = "ADI"; | |
var person = new Person(); | |
console.log(person.fname); | |
//returns 'ADI' | |
Per | |
console.log(person.__proto__ === Person.prototype); | |
//returns true | |
function Man(){console.log('In Man')}; | |
Man.prototype = new Person(); | |
//currently not setting constructor as people suggest | |
var man = new Man(); | |
//prints In Man | |
console.log(man.fname); | |
//returns 'ADI' | |
man instanceof Man | |
//returns true | |
//confused? so why do we need contructor? | |
man instanceof Person | |
//returns true | |
//thatz why :) | |
Man.prototype.constructor | |
//returns function Person(){console.log('In Person')} | |
//will it help if i change constructor of Man | |
Man.prototype.constructor = Man | |
var man2 = new Man(); | |
man2 instanceof Man | |
//returns true | |
man2 instanceof Person | |
//returns true | |
//well this doesn't solve our problem | |
//it seems reason being instanceof checks for constructor for all __proto__'s available down the chain | |
//so to test whether an object is direct instance we supposed | |
man2.__proto__.constructor.name === 'Man' | |
//returns true | |
man2.__proto__.constructor.name === 'Person' | |
//returns false | |
Person.prototype.friends =[]; | |
var person1 = new Person(); | |
var person2 = new Person(); | |
person1.friends.push('Rambo'); | |
person1.friends | |
//returns ["Rambo"] | |
person2.friends | |
//returns ["Rambo"] | |
//confused. But its expected isn't it? coz prototype in this case just assigns the reference to the objects. | |
//so suggested to avoid setting initial values using prototype | |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment