Last active
October 31, 2019 21:24
-
-
Save thecodejunkie/f87c2b680f9235f33a0543b53ece1d6e to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Explicit cs Implict reference of NETStandard.Library
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Are there any differences to the two approaches below? I.e impliclity ending up with the package reference to | |
NETStandard.Library 1.6.1, dvs running with DisableImplicitFrameworkReferences = true and adding an explicit | |
reference to NETStandard.Library? | |
Any pros/cons for either? Any hidden/implicit impacts? | |
See https://github.com/dotnet/sdk/pull/633#issuecomment-272515440 for some context | |
<Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk"> | |
<PropertyGroup> | |
<TargetFramework>net452;netstandard1.6</TargetFramework> | |
</PropertyGroup> | |
</Project> | |
vs. | |
<Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk"> | |
<PropertyGroup> | |
<TargetFramework>net452;netstandard1.6</TargetFramework> | |
<DisableImplicitFrameworkReferences>true</DisableImplicitFrameworkReferences> | |
</PropertyGroup> | |
<ItemGroup Condition=" '$(TargetFramework)' == 'netstandard1.6' "> | |
<PackageReference Include="NETStandard.Library" Version="1.6.1" /> | |
</ItemGroup> | |
</Project> |
Just guessing with .NET Core 3, DisableImplicitFrameworkReferences == true
and the fact it's not published on NuGet anymore doesn't go well together? Or is it still published?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
@dsplaisted opps! Yeah that's what I meant.. a copy/paste mistake 😊