Thomas Davis thomasdavis

Great, I’ll look into academic and practical frameworks for formally breaking down user questions and intent, drawing from linguistics, epistemology, ontology, and NLP. This will include theories of meaning, discourse analysis, question decomposition, and related computational approaches.

I’ll let you know as soon as I have a structured summary of the best-supported methodologies and tools.

Formal Frameworks for Analyzing User Intent in Natural Language

Introduction

Understanding a user's intent from a natural language query often requires decomposing the utterance into formal components of meaning. Consider the example: "Tell me if the US elections affected the Canadian ones?" – This question contains an imperative request ("Tell me...") and an embedded yes/no query about causality between two events. To analyze such an utterance, one must identify the speech act (a request for information), the semantic content (whether U.S. elections had an effect on Canadian elections), and the impli

Below is a practical recipe + Node .js scaffolding for turning your 250-page Markdown dump into three linguistics-aware assets:

CLDF StructureTable – grammar-feature spreadsheet
XIGT (JSON) – interlinear examples
OntoLex-Lemon (JSON-LD) – lexicon entries

The same pattern works for any other schema; just swap the “output-format” system message.

Below is a “from-PDF-to-production” blueprint that lets you pour the entire Grammar of Kuku Yalanji into a single modern stack – relational tables for precision, a vector index for AI search, and a graph/RDF layer for linked-data reuse.

1 Why three layers?

Layer	What it gives you	Typical tech
Relational / JSON B	Loss-less storage of paradigms, rules, example IDs; fast SQL & GraphQL	PostgreSQL 16
Vector index	Semantic retrieval for RAG (“find the paragraph that explains ergative case”)	`pgvector` inside Postgres OR an external DB like Weaviate citeturn0search2turn0search3

A grammar of the Kuku Yalanji language of north Queensland

Also in Pacific Linguistics

Mark Harvey, 2001, A grammar of Limilngan: a language of the Mary River region, Northern Territory.
Jane Simpson, David Nash, Mary Laughren, Peter Austin and Barry Alpher, 2001, Forty years on: Ken Hale and Australian languages.

David Rose, 2001, The Western Desert code: an Australian cryptogrammar.

L.A. Hercus, 1999, A grammar of the Wirangu language from the West Coast of South Australia.

Perfect — I’ll begin crafting a complete design system for PrecisionCore tailored for web applications that work well on both desktop and mobile. It’ll default to light mode, include dark mode support, and cover all essential components found in modern web apps.

The system will include:

In-depth design philosophy and visual principles
Guidelines for layout, spacing, grids, and UI behaviors
Component breakdowns with usage rules
Code examples in vanilla HTML/CSS (primary) and TailwindCSS (secondary)
Mockups and image examples of components in the PrecisionCore style

I’ll let you know as soon as it’s ready for review.

Got it. I’ll put together a comprehensive report on how BLAH can build a powerful, compute-enabled registry for tools—including support for remote CPU/GPU execution, bandwidth middle-manning, and strategic partnerships with providers. I’ll focus on how to bootstrap with CPU-based sponsored compute, evaluate which providers make the most sense based on cost, ecosystem alignment, and open-source stance, and outline how to grow the registry into an "npm for AI tools" empire.

I’ll let you know when the report is ready for review.

Compute-Enabled Registry for Remote AI Tool Execution (BLAH)

Prototype and POC Requirements

Remote CPU Execution (1-minute tasks): The initial BLAH prototype should support running tools on remote CPU-based infrastructure with short execution times (up to ~1 minute per run). This allows demonstrating end-to-end functionality without needing specialized hardware. For example, Val.town’s free tier supports 1 minute wall-clock time per execution ([Val Town](https://www.val.

Got it. I’ll dig into whether others have encountered similar issues with OpenAI models (especially GPT-4 and 4o) returning excessively long or hallucinated UUID-like lists or arrays, and if this issue is more formally known or documented. I’ll also look for workarounds developers have successfully used, especially in tagging/filtering tasks like yours.

I’ll update you as soon as I have a clear picture.

Issues with Long UUID Lists in GPT Models

Observations of Hallucinated or Duplicated IDs

Developers have indeed reported that when asking GPT models to output a long list of IDs (e.g. UUIDs or database keys), the model can produce incorrect or repeated entries. In structured JSON outputs, the model sometimes invents new IDs or duplicates existing ones instead of sticking to the provided list. For example, one OpenAI forum user noted that about 10% of the time GPT-4 would return a randomly generated ingredient ID that did not match any ID in the provided list, even though the ingredient name w

Amazing. I’m going to synthesize a beautiful, comprehensive engineering and vision report for BLAH – geared toward open source contributors and early adopters. I’ll include clear technical sections, conceptual visuals, architectural diagrams, and thoughtful critique with improvement ideas. This will balance deep protocol insight with approachable storytelling for devs and hackers who want to build or contribute.

I’ll get started and let you know when the report is ready for your review.

BLAH: Barely Logical Agent Host – Engineering Vision Report

BLAH (Barely Logical Agent Host) is an open-source platform that aspires to unify the fragmented world of AI agent tools. It provides a protocol-agnostic infrastructure for AI tool interoperability – essentially a “universal adapter” that lets AI agents use any tool through a standard interface. This report explores BLAH’s vision, architecture, current status, and future roadmap, aiming to inform and inspire open-source contributors and early adopters.

	---
	config:
	layout: fixed
	---
	flowchart TD
	n1["Message Received"] --> n2["Intent Prompt"]
	n2 --> n3["No Tool"] & n5["Found Tool"]
	n3 --> n6["Stream MainPrompt"]
	n5 --> n7["GetToolStrategy"]
	n7 --> n8["NoToolStrategy"] & n10["FoundToolStrategy"]

	{
	"$schema": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jsonresume/resume-schema/v1.0.0/schema.json",
	"basics": {
	"name": "Thomas ✽ Davis",
	"label": "Senior Javascript at Blockbid",
	"email": "[email protected]",

	"summary": "I’m a full stack web developer who loves working with open source technology. I work best at planning the architecture of web applications and their development life cycles. I also love to get the community involved and have had much experience with building and organizing large open source groups.\n\nSpecialties: React, Redux, Javascript - Full stack developer with lots of experience in lots of stuff",
	"location": {
	"countryCode": "US",