Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@thoughtfulbloke
Created May 24, 2026 08:27
Show Gist options
  • Select an option

  • Save thoughtfulbloke/bbe4be60d50de7bfdb6c78c0b494fe2d to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

Select an option

Save thoughtfulbloke/bbe4be60d50de7bfdb6c78c0b494fe2d to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Course.Code Teacher Campus Remote Course.Content Course.Delivery Other.comments rating
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 3
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 4
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 8
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 6
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 6
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 1
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 4
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 3
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 1
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 0
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 7
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 3
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 2
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 5
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 3
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 3
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 1
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 4
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 4
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 5
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 4
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 6
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 5
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 6
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 5
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 7
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 5
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 2
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 6
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 1
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 10
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 10
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 10
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 6
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 0
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 5
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 0
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 10
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 2
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 5
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 4
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 9
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 1
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 3
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 1
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 9
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 6
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 1
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 7
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 10
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 5
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 9
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 4
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 4
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 7
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 3
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 5
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 0
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 7
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 9
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 2
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 4
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 5
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 4
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 9
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 1
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 6
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 7
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 3
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 9
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 8
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 3
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 3
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 3
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 1
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 9
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 0
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 6
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 5
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 6
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 2
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 7
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 6
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 9
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 0
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 6
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 4
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 10
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 0
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 8
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 1
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 5
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 9
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 1
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 0
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 7
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 3
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 8
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 0
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 2
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 6
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 5
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 2
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 0
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 2
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 3
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 3
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 3
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 6
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 6
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 5
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 10
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 1
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 4
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 5
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 0
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 6
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 1
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 0
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 3
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 5
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 8
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 8
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 6
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 5
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 3
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 7
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 7
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 8
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 7
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 4
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 10
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 1
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 10
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 1
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 7
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 4
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 4
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 4
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 9
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 8
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 5
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 4
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 2
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 8
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 0
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 6
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 9
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 5
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 2
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 2
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 0
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 4
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 3
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 5
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 8
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 8
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 3
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 10
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 2
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 4
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 7
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 5
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 2
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 3
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 10
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 8
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 0
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 0
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 5
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 10
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 4
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 4
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 6
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 4
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 8
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 7
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 0
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 5
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 4
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 4
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 0
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 4
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 3
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 9
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 5
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 9
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 3
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 10
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 1
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 2
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 3
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 6
XMPL101 Mary Dunedin Online Content could be a bit much in places Delivery seemed a bit rushed towards the end No other comments 9
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 3
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 4
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 8
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 6
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 6
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 1
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 4
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 3
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 1
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 0
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 7
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 3
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 2
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 5
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 3
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 3
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 1
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 4
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 4
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 5
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 4
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 6
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 5
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 6
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 5
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 7
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 5
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 2
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 6
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 1
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 10
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 10
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 10
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 6
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 0
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 5
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 0
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 10
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 2
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 5
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 4
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 9
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 1
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 3
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 1
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 9
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 6
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 1
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 7
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 10
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 5
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 9
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 4
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 4
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 7
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 3
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 5
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 0
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 7
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 9
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 2
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 4
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 5
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 4
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 9
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 1
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 6
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 7
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 3
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 9
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 8
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 3
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 3
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 3
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 1
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 9
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 0
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 6
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 5
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 6
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 2
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 7
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 6
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 9
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 0
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 6
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 4
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 10
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 0
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 8
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 1
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 5
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 9
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 1
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 0
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 7
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 3
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 8
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 0
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 2
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 6
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 5
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 2
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 0
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 2
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 3
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 3
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 3
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 6
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 6
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 5
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 10
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 1
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 4
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 5
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 0
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 6
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 1
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 0
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 3
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 5
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 8
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 8
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 6
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 5
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 3
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 7
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 7
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 8
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 7
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 4
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 10
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 1
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 10
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 1
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 7
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 4
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 4
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 4
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 9
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 8
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 5
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 4
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 2
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 8
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 0
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 6
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 9
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 5
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 2
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 2
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 0
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 4
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 3
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 5
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 8
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 8
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 3
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 10
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 2
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 4
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 7
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 5
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 2
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 3
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 10
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 8
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 0
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 0
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 5
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 10
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 4
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 4
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 6
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 4
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 8
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 7
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 0
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 5
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 4
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 4
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 0
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 4
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 3
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 9
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 5
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 9
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 3
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 10
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 1
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 2
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 3
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 6
XMPL102 James Dunedin Online Content could be a bit much in places Delivery seemed a bit rushed towards the end No other comments 9
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 3
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 4
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 8
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 6
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 6
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 1
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 4
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 3
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 1
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 0
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 7
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 3
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 2
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 5
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 3
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 3
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 1
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 4
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 4
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 5
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 4
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 6
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 5
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 6
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 5
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 7
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 5
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 2
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 6
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 1
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 10
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 10
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 10
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 6
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 0
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 5
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 0
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 10
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 2
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 5
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 4
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 9
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 1
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 3
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 1
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 9
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 6
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 1
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 7
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 10
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 5
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 9
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 4
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 4
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 7
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 3
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 5
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 0
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 7
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 9
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 2
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 4
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 5
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 4
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 9
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 1
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 6
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 7
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 3
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 9
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 8
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 3
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 3
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 3
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 1
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 9
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 0
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 6
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 5
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 6
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 2
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 7
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 6
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 9
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 0
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 6
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 4
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 10
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 0
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 8
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 1
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 5
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 9
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 1
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 0
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 7
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 3
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 8
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 0
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 2
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 6
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 5
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 2
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 0
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 2
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 3
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 3
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 3
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 6
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 6
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 5
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 10
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 1
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 4
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 5
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 0
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 6
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 1
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 0
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 3
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 5
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 8
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 8
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 6
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 5
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 3
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 7
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 7
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 8
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 7
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 4
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 10
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 1
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 10
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 1
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 7
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 4
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 4
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 4
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 9
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 8
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 5
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 4
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 2
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 8
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 0
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 6
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 9
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 5
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 2
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 2
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 0
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 4
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 3
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 5
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 8
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 8
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 3
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 10
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 2
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 4
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 7
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 5
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 2
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 3
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 10
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 8
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 0
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 0
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 5
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 10
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 4
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 4
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 6
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 4
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 8
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 7
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 0
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 5
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 4
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 4
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 0
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 4
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 3
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 9
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 5
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 9
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 3
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 10
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 1
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 2
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 3
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 6
XMPL201 James Wellington Online Content could be a bit much in places Delivery seemed a bit rushed towards the end No other comments 9
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 3
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 4
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 8
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 6
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 6
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 1
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 4
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 3
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 1
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 0
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 7
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 3
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 2
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 5
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 3
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 3
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 1
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 4
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 4
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 5
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 4
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 6
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 5
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 6
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 5
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 7
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 5
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 2
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 6
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 1
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 10
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 10
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 10
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 6
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 0
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 5
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 0
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 10
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 2
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 5
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 4
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 9
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 1
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 3
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 1
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 9
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 6
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 1
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 7
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 10
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 5
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 9
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 4
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 4
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 7
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 3
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 5
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 0
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 7
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 9
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 2
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 4
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 5
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 4
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 9
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 1
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 6
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 7
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 3
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 9
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 8
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 3
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 3
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 3
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 1
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 9
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 0
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 6
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 5
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 6
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 2
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 7
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 6
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 9
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 0
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 6
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 4
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 10
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 0
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 8
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 1
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 5
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 9
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 1
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 0
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 7
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 3
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 8
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 0
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 2
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 6
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 5
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 2
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 0
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 2
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 3
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 3
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 3
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 6
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 6
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 5
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 10
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 1
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 4
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 5
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 0
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 6
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 1
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 0
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 3
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 5
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 8
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 8
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 6
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 5
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 3
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 7
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 7
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 8
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 7
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 4
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 10
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 1
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 10
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 1
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 7
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 4
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 4
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 4
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 9
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 8
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 5
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 4
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 2
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 8
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 0
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 6
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 9
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 5
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 2
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 2
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 0
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 4
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 3
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 5
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 8
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 8
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 3
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 10
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 2
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 4
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 7
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 5
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 2
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 3
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 10
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 8
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 0
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 0
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 5
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 10
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 4
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 4
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 6
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 4
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 8
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 7
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 0
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 5
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 4
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 4
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 0
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 4
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 3
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 9
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 5
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 9
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 3
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 10
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 1
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 2
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 3
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 6
XMPL202 David Wellington In Person Content could be a bit much in places Delivery seemed a bit rushed towards the end No other comments 9
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 3
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 4
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 8
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 6
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 6
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 1
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 4
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 3
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 1
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 0
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 7
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 3
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 2
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 5
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 3
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 3
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 1
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 4
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 4
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 5
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 4
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 6
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 5
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 6
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 5
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 7
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 5
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 2
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 6
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 1
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 10
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 10
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 10
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 6
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 0
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 5
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 0
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 10
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 2
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 5
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 4
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 9
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 1
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 3
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 1
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 9
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 6
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 1
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 7
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 10
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 5
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 9
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 4
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 4
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 7
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 3
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 5
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 0
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 7
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 9
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 2
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 4
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 5
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 4
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 9
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 1
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 6
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 7
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 3
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 9
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 8
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 3
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 3
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 3
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 1
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 9
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 0
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 6
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 5
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 6
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 2
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 7
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 6
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 9
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 0
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 6
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 4
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 10
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 0
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 8
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 1
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 5
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 9
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 1
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 0
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 7
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 3
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 8
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 0
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 2
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 6
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 5
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 2
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 0
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 2
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 3
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 3
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 3
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 6
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 6
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 5
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 10
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 1
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 4
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 5
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 0
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 6
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 1
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 0
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 3
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 5
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 8
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 8
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 6
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 5
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 3
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 7
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 7
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 8
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 7
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 4
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 10
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 1
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 10
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 1
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 7
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 4
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 4
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 4
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 9
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 8
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 5
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 4
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 2
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 8
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 0
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 6
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 9
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 5
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 2
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 2
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 0
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 4
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 3
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 5
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 8
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 8
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 3
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 10
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 2
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 4
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 7
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 5
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 2
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 3
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 10
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 8
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 0
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 0
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 5
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 10
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 4
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 4
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 6
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 4
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 8
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 7
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 0
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 5
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 4
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 4
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 0
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 4
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 3
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 9
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 5
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 9
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 3
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 10
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 1
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 2
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 3
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 6
XMPL301 Mary Christchurch In Person Content could be a bit much in places Delivery seemed a bit rushed towards the end No other comments 9
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 3
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 4
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 8
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 6
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 6
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 1
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 4
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 3
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 1
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 0
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 7
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 3
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 2
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 5
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 3
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 3
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 1
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 4
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 4
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 5
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 4
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 6
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 5
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 6
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 5
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 7
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 5
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 2
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 6
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 1
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 10
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 10
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 10
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 6
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 0
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 5
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 0
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 10
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 2
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 5
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 4
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 9
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 1
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 3
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 1
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 9
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 6
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 1
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 7
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 10
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 5
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 9
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 4
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 4
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 7
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 3
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 5
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 0
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 7
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 9
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 2
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 4
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 5
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 4
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 9
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 1
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 6
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 7
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 3
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 9
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 8
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 3
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 3
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 3
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 1
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 9
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 0
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 6
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 5
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 6
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 2
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 7
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 6
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 9
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 0
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 6
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 4
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 10
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 0
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 8
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 1
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 5
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 9
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 1
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 0
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 7
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 3
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 8
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 0
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 2
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 6
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 5
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 2
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 0
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 2
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 3
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 3
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 3
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 6
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 6
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 5
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 10
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 1
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 4
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 5
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 0
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 6
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 1
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 0
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 3
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 5
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 8
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 8
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 6
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 5
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 3
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 7
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 7
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 8
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 7
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 4
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 10
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 1
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 10
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 1
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 7
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 4
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 4
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 4
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 9
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 8
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 5
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 4
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 2
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 8
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 0
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 6
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 9
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 5
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 2
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 2
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 0
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 4
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 3
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 5
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 8
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 8
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 3
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 10
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 2
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 7
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 4
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 7
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 5
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 2
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 3
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 10
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 8
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 0
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 0
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 5
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 10
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 4
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 4
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 6
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 4
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 8
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 7
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 0
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 5
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 4
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 4
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 0
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 4
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content could include more diverse perspectives and case studies. Delivery sometimes focused too much on slides. I would like to see more discussion based activities. 3
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was well structured and relevant to the course goals. Delivery was clear and easy to follow. Overall I was satisfied with the course. 9
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content covered many useful topics but some areas felt a bit shallow. Delivery was generally good but the pace was sometimes too fast. I would have liked more time for questions. 5
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was challenging in a good way and made me think deeply. Delivery included helpful explanations and examples. I feel more confident in this subject now. 9
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content sometimes jumped between topics which was confusing. Delivery could have been more organized from week to week. I occasionally felt lost during the middle of the semester. 3
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content linked theory to practice in a meaningful way. Delivery used real life examples that helped my understanding. I appreciated the practical focus of the course. 10
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content repeated ideas from earlier courses without adding much depth. Delivery was fine but not very engaging. I am not sure I would recommend this course. 1
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content was very interesting and up to date with current research. Delivery showed enthusiasm and kept my attention. I enjoyed coming to class each week. 2
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content felt overloaded with details that were hard to remember. Delivery tried to cover too much in each session. I sometimes felt overwhelmed by the workload. 3
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content aligned well with the assessments and learning outcomes. Delivery prepared me well for tests and assignments. The expectations were clear throughout the course. 6
XMPL302 David Christchurch In Person Content could be a bit much in places Delivery seemed a bit rushed towards the end No other comments 9
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment