Last active
March 30, 2025 21:26
-
-
Save tlowrimore/5162327 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Unions multiple scopes on a model, and returns an instance of ActiveRecord::Relation.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| module ActiveRecord::UnionScope | |
| def self.included(base) | |
| base.send :extend, ClassMethods | |
| end | |
| module ClassMethods | |
| def union_scope(*scopes) | |
| id_column = "#{table_name}.#{primary_key}" | |
| sub_query = scopes.map { |s| s.select(id_column).to_sql }.join(" UNION ") | |
| where "#{id_column} IN (#{sub_query})" | |
| end | |
| end | |
| end |
Author
Naive but effective. Thanks !
Example usage for beginners?
I found this solution in SO: http://stackoverflow.com/a/15413611/406438
"#{table_name}.id" => "#{table_name}.#{primary_key}"
Or like this with Concern
module UnionScope
extend ActiveSupport::Concern
class_methods do
def union_scope(*scopes)
id_column = "#{table_name}.#{primary_key}"
sub_query = scopes.map { |s| s.select(id_column).to_sql }.join(' UNION ')
where "#{id_column} IN (#{sub_query})"
end
end
end
Author
@araslanov-e Thanks for the feedback. I've updated the gist to include your edit.
Author
Hi everyone, it's been a while!
I've added another GIST that extends the functionality provided in union_scope.rb, to also provide INTERSECT and EXCEPT operations. Inspired by @sekrett, I've structured this one as a Concern.
https://gist.github.com/tlowrimore/f0e3eca483395de3d373
Cheers!
Tim
id_column = "#{table_name}.#{primary_key}"
sub_query = scopes.map { |s| s.select(id_column).to_sql }.join(" UNION ")
where "#{id_column} IN (#{sub_query})"
- Is this secure against XSS or SQLi?
- I'm new with ruby on rails. Can you use
where('? IN (?)', id_column, sub_query)
instead of
where "#{id_column} IN (#{sub_query})
Cheers
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I guess I should mention that this is a somewhat naive implementation; however, it solves my needs more than 80% of the time.