Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@triangletodd

triangletodd/Gap_Analysis_UrbanCode_vs_ISPW.md

Last active August 14, 2024 03:42
Show Gist options
  • Save triangletodd/f900a2f8ed5317ff14a7659c90b9a44b to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save triangletodd/f900a2f8ed5317ff14a7659c90b9a44b to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Download ZIP
Gap Analysis - UrbanCode vs ISPW
Raw
Gap_Analysis_UrbanCode_vs_ISPW.md
Category ISPW UrbanCode GAP
Mainframe Environment Integration - Native integration with z/OS and mainframe tools.
- Strong support for COBOL, PL/I, CICS, DB2.
- Tailored workflows for mainframe.		 - Integrates with mainframe systems via plugins.
- Requires additional setup for mainframe-specific tasks.		 ISPW offers deeper and more seamless integration with mainframe environments compared to UrbanCode.
Source Code Management (SCM) - Purpose-built for mainframe SCM.
- Strong support for mainframe code branching, merging, and promotion.		 - Lacks native SCM capabilities.
- Relies on external SCM tools, like Git.		 ISPW is superior in SCM for mainframes, with native support, while UrbanCode lacks this capability.
Deployment and Release Management - Built-in deployment for mainframes.
- Handles JCL, job control, and region promotion.
- Supports staged deployments.		 - Capable of automating mainframe deployments.
- More generic deployment mechanisms.		 ISPW offers tailored mainframe deployment management, while UrbanCode requires customization.
Pipeline Management and CI/CD Integration - Mainframe-centric CI/CD integration.
- Aligned with mainframe practices for SCM, build, test, and deployment.		 - Strong generic CI/CD pipeline management.
- Requires customization for mainframe alignment.		 ISPW provides a more aligned approach for mainframe CI/CD, whereas UrbanCode is more generic.
Customization and Extensibility - Customization focused on mainframe needs.
- Extensibility options integrate with other mainframe tools.		 - Highly customizable but broad.
- Requires additional work to align with mainframe needs.		 ISPW’s customization is more relevant to mainframes, while UrbanCode is more general and flexible.
User Interface and Usability - Designed for mainframe users.
- Familiar terminology and workflows for mainframe teams.		 - Modern UI, not specialized for mainframes.
- Generalized, requiring adaptation for mainframe use.		 ISPW’s UI is more intuitive for mainframe users, whereas UrbanCode’s broader UI may be less familiar.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment