simple AES encryption/decryption example with PBKDF2 key derivation in Go, Javascript, and Python

aes.go

package main

import (
	"crypto/aes"
	"crypto/cipher"
	"crypto/rand"
	"crypto/sha256"
	"encoding/hex"
	"fmt"
	"strings"

	"golang.org/x/crypto/pbkdf2"
)

func deriveKey(passphrase string, salt []byte) ([]byte, []byte) {
	if salt == nil {
		salt = make([]byte, 8)
		// http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2898.txt
		// Salt.
		rand.Read(salt)
	}
	return pbkdf2.Key([]byte(passphrase), salt, 1000, 32, sha256.New), salt
}

func encrypt(passphrase, plaintext string) string {
	key, salt := deriveKey(passphrase, nil)
	iv := make([]byte, 12)
	// http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800-38d.pdf
	// Section 8.2
	rand.Read(iv)
	b, _ := aes.NewCipher(key)
	aesgcm, _ := cipher.NewGCM(b)
	data := aesgcm.Seal(nil, iv, []byte(plaintext), nil)
	return hex.EncodeToString(salt) + "-" + hex.EncodeToString(iv) + "-" + hex.EncodeToString(data)
}

func decrypt(passphrase, ciphertext string) string {
	arr := strings.Split(ciphertext, "-")
	salt, _ := hex.DecodeString(arr[0])
	iv, _ := hex.DecodeString(arr[1])
	data, _ := hex.DecodeString(arr[2])
	key, _ := deriveKey(passphrase, salt)
	b, _ := aes.NewCipher(key)
	aesgcm, _ := cipher.NewGCM(b)
	data, _ = aesgcm.Open(nil, iv, data, nil)
	return string(data)
}

func main() {
	c := encrypt("hello", "world")
	fmt.Println(c)
	fmt.Println(decrypt("hello", c))
	fmt.Println(decrypt("hello", "c2932347953ad4a4-25f496d260de9c150fc9e4c6-20bc1f8439796cc914eb783b9996a8d9c32d45e2df"))
}

aes.js

/**
 * Encodes a utf8 string as a byte array.
 * @param {String} str 
 * @returns {Uint8Array}
 */
function str2buf(str) {
  return new TextEncoder("utf-8").encode(str);
}

/**
 * Decodes a byte array as a utf8 string.
 * @param {Uint8Array} buffer 
 * @returns {String}
 */
function buf2str(buffer) {
  return new TextDecoder("utf-8").decode(buffer);
}

/**
 * Decodes a string of hex to a byte array.
 * @param {String} hexStr
 * @returns {Uint8Array} 
 */
function hex2buf(hexStr) {
  return new Uint8Array(hexStr.match(/.{2}/g).map(h => parseInt(h, 16)));
}

/**
 * Encodes a byte array as a string of hex.
 * @param {Uint8Array} buffer
 * @returns {String} 
 */
function buf2hex(buffer) {
  return Array.prototype.slice
    .call(new Uint8Array(buffer))
    .map(x => [x >> 4, x & 15])
    .map(ab => ab.map(x => x.toString(16)).join(""))
    .join("");
}

/**
 * Given a passphrase, this generates a crypto key
 * using `PBKDF2` with SHA256 and 1000 iterations.
 * If no salt is given, a new one is generated.
 * The return value is an array of `[key, salt]`.
 * @param {String} passphrase 
 * @param {UInt8Array} salt [salt=random bytes]
 * @returns {Promise<[CryptoKey,UInt8Array]>} 
 */
function deriveKey(passphrase, salt) {
  salt = salt || crypto.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(8));
  return crypto.subtle
    .importKey("raw", str2buf(passphrase), "PBKDF2", false, ["deriveKey"])
    .then(key =>
      crypto.subtle.deriveKey(
        { name: "PBKDF2", salt, iterations: 1000, hash: "SHA-256" },
        key,
        { name: "AES-GCM", length: 256 },
        false,
        ["encrypt", "decrypt"],
      ),
    )
    .then(key => [key, salt]);
}

/**
 * Given a passphrase and some plaintext, this derives a key
 * (generating a new salt), and then encrypts the plaintext with the derived
 * key using AES-GCM. The ciphertext, salt, and iv are hex encoded and joined
 * by a "-". So the result is `"salt-iv-ciphertext"`.
 * @param {String} passphrase 
 * @param {String} plaintext
 * @returns {Promise<String>} 
 */
function encrypt(passphrase, plaintext) {
  const iv = crypto.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(12));
  const data = str2buf(plaintext);
  return deriveKey(passphrase).then(([key, salt]) =>
    crypto.subtle
      .encrypt({ name: "AES-GCM", iv }, key, data)
      .then(ciphertext => `${buf2hex(salt)}-${buf2hex(iv)}-${buf2hex(ciphertext)}`),
  );
}

/**
 * Given a key and ciphertext (in the form of a string) as given by `encrypt`,
 * this decrypts the ciphertext and returns the original plaintext
 * @param {String} passphrase 
 * @param {String} saltIvCipherHex 
 * @returns {Promise<String>}
 */
function decrypt(passphrase, saltIvCipherHex) {
  const [salt, iv, data] = saltIvCipherHex.split("-").map(hex2buf);
  return deriveKey(passphrase, salt)
    .then(([key]) => crypto.subtle.decrypt({ name: "AES-GCM", iv }, key, data))
    .then(v => buf2str(new Uint8Array(v)));
}

// EXAMPLE
/*
encrypt("hello", "world")
  .then(v => console.log("ENCRYPTED", v) || v)
  .then(v => decrypt("hello", v))
  .then(v => console.log("DECRYPTED ", v) || v);
  
  decrypt(
    "hello",
    "6102677198e41d98-84c95e2d7caf6f2d4ccbfe3c-3093cef35d0dba7a24d37f7d4580b5ad83c154329c",
  ).then(console.log);
*/

aes.py

import hashlib
import os
from binascii import hexlify, unhexlify
from cryptography.hazmat.primitives.ciphers.aead import AESGCM


def deriveKey(passphrase: str, salt: bytes=None) -> [str, bytes]:
    if salt is None:
        salt = os.urandom(8)
    return hashlib.pbkdf2_hmac("sha256", passphrase.encode("utf8"), salt, 1000), salt


def encrypt(passphrase: str, plaintext: str) -> str:
    key, salt = deriveKey(passphrase)
    aes = AESGCM(key)
    iv = os.urandom(12)
    plaintext = plaintext.encode("utf8")
    ciphertext = aes.encrypt(iv, plaintext, None)
    return "%s-%s-%s" % (hexlify(salt).decode("utf8"), hexlify(iv).decode("utf8"), hexlify(ciphertext).decode("utf8"))


def decrypt(passphrase: str, ciphertext: str) -> str:
    salt, iv, ciphertext = map(unhexlify, ciphertext.split("-"))
    key, _ = deriveKey(passphrase, salt)
    aes = AESGCM(key)
    plaintext = aes.decrypt(iv, ciphertext, None)
    return plaintext.decode("utf8")


if __name__ == "__main__":
    ciphertext = encrypt("hello", "world")
    print(ciphertext)
    print(decrypt("hello", ciphertext))
    print(decrypt("hello", "6102677198e41d98-84c95e2d7caf6f2d4ccbfe3c-3093cef35d0dba7a24d37f7d4580b5ad83c154329c"))

Could I decrypt this password?
:pbkdf2:sha256:10000:128:tMG5uKJ5egwoZu8SEy9xlw==:U+5GmBqgfuD/GjUe7zy/n2MAdU64E6oO9SUT7qjsG1mw2ezSiW2WH2lPgxPKZA7ZHXs3+4Birh01GKRG+V8DeEXlo8DlcgWcIx+NaeWWTMN8u3nzPdgah548UWksu8SIH9iGmjnA3UKCfs8qFCQ7OPGA+rZejrfoTUAJywKTaHM=

I notice the python implementation of AESGCM uses the hmac modifier rather than just pbkdf2. Would this not lead to problems with the other provided implementations? Specifically the js implementation that utilizes crypto-subtle's PBKDF2 key derivation but does not include the HMAC modifier?

I notice the python implementation of AESGCM uses the hmac modifier rather than just pbkdf2. Would this not lead to problems with the other provided implementations? Specifically the js implementation that utilizes crypto-subtle's PBKDF2 key derivation but does not include the HMAC modifier?

Good question. I believe the JS implementation is using HMAC in the PRF. I have two reasons to believe this:

1. The prf in the pbkdf2-params object is a MAC generation function https://www.w3.org/TR/WebCryptoAPI/#pbkdf2-params
2. All the implementations should be able to encrypt/decrypt the same data. If the python and js versions used a different key derivation method, we should not expect that to work. To test this yourself, you can run the code samples and see. If they don't both decrypt the same string to the same value using the same password, that would be a problem!

I notice the python implementation of AESGCM uses the hmac modifier rather than just pbkdf2. Would this not lead to problems with the other provided implementations? Specifically the js implementation that utilizes crypto-subtle's PBKDF2 key derivation but does not include the HMAC modifier?

Good question. I believe the JS implementation is using HMAC in the PRF. I have two reasons to believe this:

1. The prf in the pbkdf2-params object is a MAC generation function https://www.w3.org/TR/WebCryptoAPI/#pbkdf2-params
2. All the implementations should be able to encrypt/decrypt the same data. If the python and js versions used a different key derivation method, we should not expect that to work. To test this yourself, you can run the code samples and see. If they don't both decrypt the same string to the same value using the same password, that would be a problem!

You're right. Tested and confirmed. Thanks!