SAR is not compensating for the doppler of moving targets. It only compensates for the doppler shift of stationary targets as it assumes that all targets are stationary on Earth. SAR has side lobes because of which when those capture doppler, they might not suffice Nyquist criterion.
Two filters,which differ only in the signs of the phase responses, are used to defocus the complex image respectively. In the two defocused images,each stationary target is blurred to the same extent,but each moving target is blurred to different extents. Therefore, moving targets can be indicated by patch-by-patch sharpness comparison of the two defocused images. The results of the simulated and real data show that this algorithm is effective and efficient.
- We have an azimuth signal
- We take an FFT of it and we focus it with a H(f) filter.
- With Filter 1 , defocusing is done on Step2 output, we obtain S1(f)
- With Filter 2 , defocusing is done on Step2 output, we obtain S2(f)
- Inverse FFT of S1(f) gives s1(t)
- Inverse FFT of S2(f) gives s2(t)
- If Stationary targets, then both filters will have same Time Period thus blurring of same extent
- If Moving targets, then both filters will have different Time Periods thus blurring to different extent
- We use contrast to find absolute difference between the two images.
- The contrast of these two patches are calculated patch-by-patch.
- We use Constant False Alarm Method to find a probability density function of the Contrast difference.
- SAR Raw Data is given.
- FFT in range
- Range Compression
- FFT in Azimuth
- RCMC
- Azimuth Compression
- 2D FFT
Explaining Azimuthal Compression
Replica gets expanded in the range direction for that chirp length.
Since I am moving in azimuth, it will get expanded in the azimuth direction as well.
Now since the range changes per azimuth unit value, the locus of my range is a hyperbola.
So since my range compression output is a hyperbola i.e my range cell gets migrated from expected x1
to x1'.
We need to do RCMC (Range Cell Migration Correction)
Or in layman terms, straighten up the hyperbola.
Only after straightening, we can do azimuthal compression (logical reason)
Observations
When moving targets are included, point targets get spread after azimuthal compression, and before azimuthal
compression, the lines are more and it is thicker.
When only stationary(multiple) and no moving targets are included, the point target's range compression output
is thinner and goes thicker with more stationary targets.
No histogram creation afte r azimuthal compression. Why?
Histogram shows sinc function overall after range compression.
Conclusions
More the number of st/moving targets, the decompression output will be thicker for both real and imag images.
THAT IS
WE CANNOT MAKE OUT MOVING TARGET THROUGH JUST RANGE COMPRESSION
More the number of st/moving targets, point after the second compression, will be spread over more points(aka Blob).
According to Jalpa Maam, they will be a connected polygon.
Stationary: Smaller Blob
Moving: Larger Blob
Lines thicker for moving multiple than stat multiple.
For AMPL images,