Moving commits between branches

branch-fu.md

Example: Moving up to a few commits to another branch

Branch A has commits (X,Y) that also need to be in Branch B. The cherry-pick operations should be done in the same chronological order that the commits appear in Branch A.

cherry-pick does support a range of commits, but if you have merge commits in that range, it gets really complicated

git checkout branch-B
git cherry-pick X
git cherry-pick Y

Example: Moving a range of commits

Branch A has a series of commits (X..Y) that need to be moved to branch B. For this case, you'll need to specify the commit before the initial commit you're interested in order for it to be included. Example: you want commits B..D from (...A->B->C->D-E->...) you would use "A" as the starting commit. You'll also need the commit SHA for the HEAD of the branch you are transferring to.

git checkout branch-B
git log  # Note the SHA of most recent commit (M)
git rebase --onto M <commit before X> Y
git rebase HEAD branch-B

Thank you. it was slow resolving conflicts from each commit at a time before continuing rebase to the next one. (if there is a conflict after each commit in the sequence, you have to resolve it then git add and git rebase --continue). It would be useful instead to combine all the commits and resolve the conflicts that all of them made to a file.

This line is confusing... git rebase --onto M <commit before X> Y

What is M in this case? If we're moving commits from branch-A to branch-B wouldn't it be git rebase --onto A <[one before]start> <end>?

@RepeatDaily from the line above the one you referenced, M is the SHA of the most recent commit:

git log # Note the SHA of most recent commit (M)

Thanks. I needed to move only one commit, so cherry-pick did the trick.

This was awesome. thank you so much!

I think you're referring to a series of commits as both X..Y and A, B, C.. here. On top of that, you refer also to branches as A and B. Will you please rewrite this with consistent and non-redundant names?

A great and elegant solution, thanks!

I don't think you need
git log # Note the SHA of most recent commit (M)

Just:

git checkout branch-B
git rebase --onto branch-B <commit before X> Y
git rebase HEAD branch-B

There's an alternative way for moving a range of commits to another branch, but the following only works for the latest commits.

• First create a new branch:

  $ git branch branch-b

  This new branch will contain all the commits from master (or whatever the current branch is).
• Now move the master branch back as many commits as you like:

  $ git reset --keep HEAD~2    # Move master branch back 2 commits
  $ git reset --keep <commit>  # Move master branch back to a specific commit

I found the explanation here.

I think it's like this:

Branch A has commit ...->a->b->c->d->e
Branch B is the destination of merging. ...->z
And you want to move commits b..e on top of the commit z (whis is in branch B).
In this case, run

git checkout B
git rebase --onto z a e` on branch B
git rebase HEAD B

It's better to make a buckup before running commands.

I have only branch master with commits ...->a->b->c->d->e:

o - o - a - b - c - d - e (master HEAD)

Now I'd like to move commits b to e to branch second so that it will branch out right from commit a of master:

o - o - a (master HEAD)
         \ 
          b - c - d - e (second HEAD)

How am I supposed to do that? The scenario used here doesn't work to me.

How do I do it now:

git checkout master
git branch second
git reset --hard a

then I go and remove unneeded files left in master after reset.

So now I'm done with desired result.
But I believe there is a better way to do what I want.

Sorry, but this makes no sense. It still needs some clarification. And what really drives me crazy, is that if you don't do this command exactly right, you can create a complete mess that will take hours of cherry-picking and searching through the reflog to undo. So it's not like you can experiment.

Branch A has a series of commits (X..Y) that need to be moved to branch B. For this case, you'll need to specify the commit before the initial commit you're interested in order for it to be included. Example: you want commits B..D from (...A->B->C->D-E->...) you would use "A" as the starting commit. You'll also need the commit SHA for the HEAD of the branch you are transferring to.

Where are commits X through Y in relation to commits A through E ? You're referring to Branch A and commit A. Are they the same? Where did branch B come from? Is it related to branch A or commit B? or does that not matter?

OK, you checkout branch B. Now rebase "onto" it the commits X through Y.

For this case, you'll need to specify the commit before the initial commit you're interested in order for it to be included.

In your example, we're interested in X and Y. So we find "M" which is the "most recent commit". You say the command is:

git rebase --onto M <commit before X> Y

so that's:

git rebase --onto <most recent commit> <commit before X> Y

But since we just did a checkout of branch B, why isn't M == HEAD? Or why not

git rebase --onto HEAD <commit before X> Y

which is (according to the documentation) the save as:

git reset --hard HEAD  ; git rebase <commit before X> Y

which is the same as

git rebase X^ Y

Or ... am I missing something? If not, the example is simply:

git checkout -b new-branch commit-of-starting-point
git rebase X^ Y

I used this today and the Git did not implode 🎉 Thank you

Thanks, used cherry-pick today for the first time without collapsing the space-time continuum <3
@iampeterbanjo i feel your concerns :)

Nice and easy, thank you for the explanation and comments in the section for alternatives!

This article explains it well in details.

How To Move A Commit To Another Branch In Git