example of possible curl/tdd/isolate

isolate.md

curl/tdd/runner is a bit complicated atm. Just thinking of something that might be a bit simpler:

curl(['curl/tdd/isolate'], function (isolate) {

	// inject AMD `require` and `define`, as well as a "done" callback.
	// the test function is guaranteed to run in isolation and all modules 
	// are undefined afterward.
	isolate(function test (require, define, done) {

		// define mocks:
		define('pkg/mod1', { foo: 42 });
		define('pkg/mod2', ['pkg/dep1'], function (dep1) {
			return {
				bar: function (val) { return String(dep1(val)); }
			}
		});

		// fetch the module to test and any unmocked modules
		require(['pkg/unit/to/test'], function (unitToTest) {
			// tests go here
			assert.equals('a string', unitToTest.method('a string'));
			unitToTest.asyncThing(function (val) {
				// more tests
				assert.true(val);
				done();
			})
		});

		// hmmm. anything here will exec before require callback and may
		// cause confusion?

	});

});

Here's another possible API that removes the uncertainty of code around the async require:

curl(['curl/tdd/isolate'], function (isolate) {

	// the test function is run in isolation and the mocker function is run
	// immediately prior.  all modules are undefined afterward.
	isolate(
		['pkg/unit/to/test', 'other/unmocked/thing'],
		function mocker (define) {
			// define mocks:
			define('pkg/mod1', { foo: 42 });
			define('pkg/mod2', ['pkg/dep1'], function (dep1) {
				return {
					bar: function (val) { return String(dep1(val)); }
				}
			});
		},
		function test (unitToTest, otherThing, /* yuk: extra param */ done) {
			// tests go here
			assert.equals('a string', unitToTest.method('a string'));
			unitToTest.asyncThing(function (val) {
				assert.true(val);
				done();
			})
		}
	);

});

It should be pretty easy to make it configurable:

// example config to use curl/tdd/isolate with requirejs
isolate.config({
	require: requirejs,
	define: define, // redundant
	undefine: requirejs.undefine
});

// setup and teardown ???
isolate.config({
	setup: mySetupFunction, // runs before each mocker function
	teardown: myteardownFunction // runs after each test
});

Since js is single-threaded, we could obtain a done function inside the test:

function test (unitToTest, otherThing) {
	var done = isolate.waitFor('my test'); // get a named "done" function
	// tests go here
	assert.equals('a string', unitToTest.method('a string'));
	unitToTest.asyncThing(function (val) {
		assert.true(val);
		done();
	})
}

I see the benefits for pure AMD modules, but for UMD modules, how well is this going to work on Node? My test case should be just as portable as my module. In that case I'd want to use node's native require instead of curl's.

Do you need a done function? If the context follows the require/define functions, any modules loaded with that require/define should use that context. Each invocation of the test function should get a fresh context. done() looks like a hack to avoid contextualizing require/define.

Test runners, buster in particular, want to build up the full test suite context before starting to invoke the tests. That means curl would need to provide all of the environments before any of the actual tests start to execute. This should just work with normal js closure scopes, but it's good to keep in mind.

Thanks for the heads-up about CJS and node environs. It seems the isolate module could be made to work in those environs, too. I imagine it would just mock the define(). There's not as much need to deal with async -- at least when require()ing modules.

My initial thoughts were that the only way to truly isolate the context was via time slicing, but since we're also intercepting the define(), the contexts may be able to execute in parallel.