Marginal Propensity to Consume. Transitory vs. Permanent Shocks. The Paradox of Thrift and Toil.
Platforms for collaboration? Issues with Uptake? The CFPB experience. [Moved to lunch] [Bill Shelton]
- What tools to foster collaboration here? What infrastracture?
- Open-source issues with uptake and collaboration
- General topics and experiences at CFPB
- Licensing issues?
- We don't want to discourage usage.
How Open Source approaches can help
Ref: Pin Theory
- Leveraging collaboration, specialization, and generalization
- Tower of Babel: Fragmentation!
- Adaptability is key
- Stallman's "free vs. free beer"
- '...you should think of “free” as in “free speech,” not as in “free beer”.'
- Freedom to make changes
- Notion of participation
- Meritocracy based
- The currency is the level of adoption and participation
- E.g., the Linux kernel.
- Having your code accepted into the Kernel is considered a badge of honor
- E.g., the Linux kernel.
- Licensing
- Need to articulate how you expect or want the software to be used?
- Do you feel it should not be used for any "for profit" proprietary products?
- Choosing the least restrictive may be a good choice.
- MIT, BSD
- Creative Commons is gaining traction with certain kinds of properties; e.g., content.
- Public domain ?
- Public Domain may be interpreted differently outside of the US.
- Need to articulate how you expect or want the software to be used?
- Many tools and collaboration platforms exist:
- Code collaboration (git has gained tremendous traction in it's short live. vs. CVS and Subversion)
- GitHub
- BitBucket
- GitLab
- Issue Tracking
- It's common to have this coupled with code tools, like GitHub, and there're great integration points and innovative code review tools
- Documentation
- Web hosting of HTML is readily available
- publication workflow becomes an issue
- LaTeX can be used
- GitHub allows for hosting and publishing via a typical git workflow
- Q&A:
- econ stack overflow site
- Google Groups
- Probably don't need both--creates fragmentation ...?
- Don't assume that "Build it and they will come" holds true!
- Assume that passive communication won't work
- Contribution models
- Ownership; Benevolent Dictator
- Meritocracy
- Good scientific computing know-how
- Motivations
- ...
- Competition?
- Does openness threaten or undermine the currency of intellectual property or "publication currency"?