-
-
Save wajahatkarim3/ebe01a5fe57c15b83c772a65da301bff to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Kotlin extension functions to start a generic Activity
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
package com.pascalwelsch.extensions | |
import android.app.Activity | |
import android.content.Context | |
import android.content.Intent | |
import android.os.Build | |
import android.os.Bundle | |
/** | |
* Extensions for simpler launching of Activities | |
*/ | |
inline fun <reified T : Any> Activity.launchActivity( | |
requestCode: Int = -1, | |
options: Bundle? = null, | |
noinline init: Intent.() -> Unit = {}) { | |
val intent = newIntent<T>(this) | |
intent.init() | |
if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= Build.VERSION_CODES.JELLY_BEAN) { | |
startActivityForResult(intent, requestCode, options) | |
} else { | |
startActivityForResult(intent, requestCode) | |
} | |
} | |
inline fun <reified T : Any> Context.launchActivity( | |
options: Bundle? = null, | |
noinline init: Intent.() -> Unit = {}) { | |
val intent = newIntent<T>(this) | |
intent.init() | |
if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= Build.VERSION_CODES.JELLY_BEAN) { | |
startActivity(intent, options) | |
} else { | |
startActivity(intent) | |
} | |
} | |
inline fun <reified T : Any> newIntent(context: Context): Intent = | |
Intent(context, T::class.java) |
Why do you use startActivityForResult instead of startActivity?
IDK, but would it be good to be able to choose which one to use?
For example, one fun launchActivity and another one fun launchActivityForResult.
What do you think? Or is it right to use alwaysstartActivityForResult?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Usage