rdfx_lightweightmarkuplanguages.n3

# :*_markdown_github[__html]
# :*_markdown_commonmark[__html]
# Markdown[HTML] > MarkdownGithub[HTML]
# Markdown[HTML] > MarkdownCommonmark[HTML]


rdfx:Markdown a rdfs:Datatype ;
  .

rdfx:MarkdownGithub a rdfs:Datatype ;
  .

rdfx:MarkdownCommonMark a rdfs:Datatype ;
  .
  
rdfx:MarkdownHTML
  a rdfs:Datatype ;
  rdfs:label "MarkdownHTML"@en ;
  rdfs:comment "Markdown -> HTML"@en ;
  .


rdfx:MarkdownCommonMarkHTML           # this [would not require] RDFS/OWL expansion
  a rdfs:Datatype;
  rdfx:syntax rdfx:CommonMark ;       # this [would require] RDFS/OWL expansion
  rdfs:subClassOf rdf:MarkdownHTML ;  # this [would require] RDF/OWL expansion
  .
  
rdfx:description_markdown_github
  a rdf:Property ;
  rdfs:range [
      rdf:type owl:Class ;
      owl:unionOf (
          xsd:string
          schema:Text
          sysont:Markdown
          rdfx:Markdown
        ) ;
    ] ;
  .

  
## simple solution that works today:
# e.g. for schema:description
#              ex:description_markdown_github
#              ex:description_markdown_github__html
#              ex:description_markdown_commonmark
#              ex:description_markdown_commonmark__html

ex:description_markdown
  a rdf:Property ;
  rdfs:range [
      rdf:type owl:Class ;
      owl:unionOf (
          xsd:string
          schema:Text
          sysont:Markdown
          rdfx:Markdown
        ) ;
    ] ;

ex:description_markdown_github
  a rdf:Property ;
  rdfs:range [
      rdf:type owl:Class ;
      owl:unionOf (
          xsd:string
          schema:Text
          sysont:Markdown
          rdfx:Markdown
        ) ;
    ] ;
  .

ex:description_markdown_commonmark
  a rdf:Property ;
  rdfs:range [
      rdf:type owl:Class ;
      owl:unionOf (
          xsd:string
          schema:Text
          sysont:Markdown
          rdfx:Markdown
        ) ;
    ] ;
  .

ex:description_markdown__html
  a rdf:Property;
  rdfs:range [
      rdf:type owl:Class ;
      owl:unionOf (
          rdf:HTML
          rdfx:MarkdownHTML
        ) ;
    ] ;
  .

ex:description_markdown_commonmark__html
  a rdf:Property;
  rdfs:range [
      rdf:type owl:Class ;
      owl:unionOf (
          rdf:HTML
          rdfx:MarkdownHTML
          rdfx:MarkdownCommonmarkHTML
        ) ;
    ] ;
  .

#

:thing1 a schema:Thing ;
  rdfx:markdown "# example";
  rdfx:markdown__html "<h1>example</h1>";
  schemax:description_markdown "# example";
  schemax:description_markdown__html "<h1>example</h1>";
  .
  
:thing2_commonmark a schema:Thing ;
  rdfx:markdown          " # example" ;
  rdfx:markdown__html "<h1>example</h1>"^^rdfx:MarkdownCommonmarkHTML ;
  schemax:description_markdown              "# example"^^rdfx:MarkdownCommonMark ;
  schemax:description_markdown__html "<h1>example</h1>"^^rdfx:MarkdownCommonMarkHTML ; 
  .
  
:thing3_commonmark a schema:Thing ;"# example"^^rdfx:MarkdownCommonmark ;
  schemax:description_en_markdown       "# example"^^rdfx:MarkdownCommonMark ;
  schemax:description_en_markdown__html "<h1>example</h1>"^^rdfx:MarkdownCommonMarkHTML ;
  
  # according to https://jena.apache.org/documentation/notes/typed-literals.html ,
  # we can't use xml:Lang with typed literals, so e.g. the following is not
  # technically valid::
  #
  #   @en^^rdfx:MarkdownCommonmark is not spec'd
  
  # if this was valid, we could pseudo-key on xml:Lang
  # so it would be
  #   schemax:description_markdown "..."@en^^rdfx:MarkdownCommonMark ;
  # rather than
  #   schemax:description_markdown "..."@en-us ;
  #   schemax:description_markdown "..."@en-gb ;
  #   # or #
  #   schemax:description_markdown_en "..."^^rdfx:MarkdownCommonMark ;
  #   schemax:description_markdown_en-gb "..."^^rdfx:MarkdownCommonMark ;
  #

according to https://jena.apache.org/documentation/notes/typed-literals.html ,
we can't use xml:Lang with typed literals [...]

How can we enumerate Lighweight Markup Languages with URIs?

ASCII collation?

• rdfx: rdfs:labels:
  • BBCode
  • CommonMark
  • Markdown
  • MarkdownCommonMark
  • MarkdownGithub
  • MediaWikiMarkup
  • ReStructuredText
  • Textile
  • ...

Could/should these [also/instead] be lowercase for use as datatypes? e.g. xsd:string, xsd:integer

• thisisonelongword --
• CamelCase -- rdfs:Class
• under_scores -- [python] variables, member_variables, function_names

Why the __ in __html?

description_markdown = "# h1"

description_markdown__html   # description_markdown__html isDerivedFrom description_markdown

description__markdown__html  # markdown is not computed from description
                             # but, this could show that, both:
                             #   description__markdown__html isDerivedFrom description__markdown
                             #   description__markdown isInsteadOfAlso description


description_markdownhtml
description__MarkdownHTML
descriptionMarkdownHTML      # this is the traditional RDFS/OWL Property camelCasing
                             # downstream variables are then named accordingly
                             # 
                             # so, in Python (with PEP 8)::
                             #
                             #   description_markdown_html = descriptionMarkdownHTML
                             #
                             # and then in JSON / JSON-LD::
                             #
                             #  { "name": "one",
                             #    "description__markdown": "# h1",
                             #    "description__markdown__html": "<h1>h1</h1>",
                             #   },
                             #  { "name": "one",
                             #    "descriptionMarkdown": "# h1",
                             #    "descriptionMarkdownHTML": "<h1>h1</h1>",
                             #   }

attr, fmt = key.split('__', -1) if key.startswith('description_')