wilkie wilkie

An Infrastructure to Promote Sustainable Coding

We have long promoted the idea of the re-usability of our code. After an era of writing for our machines instead of ourselves, we discovered that human literacy was preferred over performance. From this notion, we developed higher level languages that started to abstract and even completely obscure the underlying machine. A beautiful era emerged where the Turing machine was our model, and humans our audience.

However, these methods of human expression are not compatible. Although they all express and run upon the same theoretical basis, they cannot collaborate effectively. This is due, ironically, to the constraints set upon the languages at the machine level. For instance, {Rust, D, Java} implies a garbage collector to allow object expressions that ignore allocations and to better analyze the lifetimes of these objects. When the language constrains the type of garbage collector policy, this constrains the languages that can be used together.

However, it is

	http://www.qwantz.com/index.php?comic=2135

	88_88 staring intently tarantula

	88‿88 smiling tarantula

	88ᴗ88 SMILING tarantula

	88Д88 angered tarantula

	void strcpy(char* dest, char* src) {
	src = "aaa";
	while(dest++ = src++);
	}

	int main(void) {
	char buff[64];
	strcpy(buff, "Look ma, ");
	strcat(buff, "no #includes");
	printf(buff);

	/+
	Inner classes contain a hidden field that contains a reference to the
	instance of the outer class. D has a special 'new' expression that can
	be used to create instances of inner classes and attach them to outer
	class instances.
	+/

	// Using printf
	extern(C) int printf(char*, ...);

	// Parses the following CFG (assuming the only characters are '(' and ')')
	// A -> B \| ""
	// B -> ( B ) \| ( )

	function parseA(tokens) {
	if (tokens[0].length === 0) {
	// A -> ""
	return true;
	}

	#define _WIN32_WINNT 0x0500

	#include <windows.h>
	#include <windowsx.h>
	#include <GL/gl.h>
	#include <GL/glu.h>

	#include <dwmapi.h>

	#pragma comment (lib, "opengl32.lib")

	My reply to http://laurasanders.net/a-primer-on-sexism-in-the-tech-industry-by-an-actual-girl/

	Thank you for writing this article. I do appreciate your comments on the original article, and pointed out some problems I had not seen at first.
	However, just as he is clearly over-generalizing, you may be under-generalizing. The systemic oppression of women in this field is indeed strong
	and undermines female involvement. Let me go through your points.

	1. It's true. The article does not tackle sexism directly. http://rarlindseysmash.com/index.php?n=1313531468 is an article about sexism. Written
	by a woman. Uses facts and citations.

	Does he need to define the words? Unfortunately yes. You tell a white-male-techy that they are using 'privilege' and they'll respond 'I've never

	# This program will select at random a set of speakers and look at the gender breakdown given 20% women

	total_speakers = 15
	percentage_of_women = 0.25

	hist, list, results = {}, [], []

	(1000 * (1 - percentage_of_women)).floor.times{list << 0}
	(1000 * percentage_of_women).floor.times{list << 1}

	#include "atomic_counter.hpp"

	AtomicCounter::AtomicCounter() {
	AtomicCounter(0);
	}

	AtomicCounter::AtomicCounter(unsigned int value) :
	_value(value) {
	}