Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@wilmoore
Last active January 18, 2026 00:53
Show Gist options
  • Select an option

  • Save wilmoore/005dceb7b19a18ee36b1631666cc4026 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

Select an option

Save wilmoore/005dceb7b19a18ee36b1631666cc4026 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Business :: Ideas :: The Leverage Gap

Business :: Ideas :: The Leverage Gap

βͺΌ Made with πŸ’œ by Polyglot.

sources

How Ordinary People Reclaim Power in an Automated Economy


⏺ ╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
  β•‘  CONCEPT SCAN                                                 β•‘
  ╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
  β•‘                                                               β•‘
  β•‘  Recommendation: CAUTION                                      β•‘
  β•‘                                                               β•‘
  β•‘  ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────║
  β•‘                                                               β•‘
  β•‘  Demand Clarity     [Strong]                                  β•‘
  β•‘                                                               β•‘
  β•‘  The market signal is clear: 67% of workers seeking side      β•‘
  β•‘  income cite financial need, AI tool adoption is at 26%+      β•‘
  β•‘  and rising, and the "Employee+" trend (diversifying          β•‘
  β•‘  income without quitting) grew to 5.4% of workers in 2025.    β•‘
  β•‘  Your thesisβ€”that leverage is now cheap and accessibleβ€”       β•‘
  β•‘  addresses a real pain point with growing urgency.            β•‘
  β•‘                                                               β•‘
  β•‘  ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────║
  β•‘                                                               β•‘
  β•‘  Timing             [Moderate] risk                           β•‘
  β•‘                                                               β•‘
  β•‘  The AI-and-work conversation is HOT right now. This is       β•‘
  β•‘  both opportunity and risk. Books like "The Coming Wave,"     β•‘
  β•‘  "Co-Intelligence," and "Human + Machine" dominate the        β•‘
  β•‘  space. Your angleβ€”individual leverage rather than macro      β•‘
  β•‘  economic predictionsβ€”is underserved but not unique.          β•‘
  β•‘  Side hustle books (Guillebeau) and business leverage books   β•‘
  β•‘  (Fredrickson) exist but don't synthesize AI + leverage       β•‘
  β•‘  + employee optionality the way you're positioning.           β•‘
  β•‘  Window is open but narrowing as more authors chase the       β•‘
  β•‘  AI-work intersection.                                        β•‘
  β•‘                                                               β•‘
  β•‘  ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────║
  β•‘                                                               β•‘
  β•‘  Differentiation    [Strong]                                  β•‘
  β•‘                                                               β•‘
  β•‘  Your unique angle: Most AI-work books are either (a) macro   β•‘
  β•‘  economic predictions, (b) corporate AI strategy, or          β•‘
  β•‘  (c) tactical tool guides. None synthesize:                   β•‘
  β•‘    β€’ Individual leverage (not corporate)                      β•‘
  β•‘    β€’ The leverage-vs-effort mental model                      β•‘
  β•‘    β€’ Multiple paths (employed vs. entrepreneurial)            β•‘
  β•‘    β€’ Automation as personal power tool                        β•‘
  β•‘                                                               β•‘
  β•‘  The "leverage gap" framing is fresh. The "dependent vs.      β•‘
  β•‘  leveraged" distinction cuts through the tired "employee      β•‘
  β•‘  vs. entrepreneur" binary. This is a genuinely new angle.     β•‘
  β•‘                                                               β•‘
  β•‘  ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────║
  β•‘                                                               β•‘
  β•‘  Platform           [Weak]                                    β•‘
  β•‘                                                               β•‘
  β•‘  Tech/software background gives credibility to write about    β•‘
  β•‘  automation and leverage. However, no existing audience is    β•‘
  β•‘  a significant disadvantage for traditional publishing.       β•‘
  β•‘  Agents and publishers now expect authors to bring            β•‘
  β•‘  distribution. First-time authors with no platform face       β•‘
  β•‘  uphill battles for advances above $25K.                      β•‘
  β•‘                                                               β•‘
  β•‘  ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────║
  β•‘                                                               β•‘
  β•‘  Summary:                                                     β•‘
  β•‘                                                               β•‘
  β•‘  Your concept is strong. The "leverage gap" framing is        β•‘
  β•‘  differentiated, the timing is right, and the demand is       β•‘
  β•‘  real. The weakness is platformβ€”you're building from          β•‘
  β•‘  scratch. Traditional publishers will likely offer modest     β•‘
  β•‘  advances ($5K-$25K) to a debut author without proven         β•‘
  β•‘  distribution, regardless of concept quality.                 β•‘
  β•‘                                                               β•‘
  β•‘  This doesn't mean "don't pursue traditional publishing"β€”     β•‘
  β•‘  it means go in with clear eyes about leverage dynamics.      β•‘
  β•‘  Ironically, your book's thesis applies to your own           β•‘
  β•‘  situation: you could build leverage FIRST (newsletter,       β•‘
  β•‘  audience, proof of reach) then negotiate from strength.      β•‘
  β•‘                                                               β•‘
  β•‘  ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────║
  β•‘                                                               β•‘
  β•‘  Paths Forward:                                               β•‘
  β•‘                                                               β•‘
  β•‘  1. PURSUE TRADITIONALLY NOW                                  β•‘
  β•‘     Proceed with query/proposal. Accept that advances will    β•‘
  β•‘     be modest. Use the book to build platform for book #2.    β•‘
  β•‘                                                               β•‘
  β•‘  2. BUILD LEVERAGE FIRST                                      β•‘
  β•‘     Spend 6-12 months building audience (Substack, LinkedIn,  β•‘
  β•‘     etc.) publishing chapters/ideas, then query with proven   β•‘
  β•‘     reach. Commands significantly better terms.               β•‘
  β•‘                                                               β•‘
  β•‘  3. SHIP INDEPENDENTLY                                        β•‘
  β•‘     Self-publish or use a hybrid press. Keep 100% of          β•‘
  β•‘     royalties. Use the book as a platform-building tool       β•‘
  β•‘     rather than waiting for platform to pitch.                β•‘
  β•‘                                                               β•‘
  β•‘  The strongest traditional publishing position: write 2-3     β•‘
  β•‘  sample chapters, publish them as a Substack series, grow     β•‘
  β•‘  to 5K+ subscribers, then query. Agents love "I already       β•‘
  β•‘  have an audience who wants this book."                       β•‘
  β•‘                                                               β•‘
  β•šβ•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•


Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment