Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@wizbubba1
Last active May 9, 2025 18:28
Show Gist options
  • Save wizbubba1/1a2e9f05e0c1e70e9e4e493dd8fe4e76 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save wizbubba1/1a2e9f05e0c1e70e9e4e493dd8fe4e76 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

Spreadsheet link to Master Repository with ENA entries updated: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1BVQhAxJLCAGkCg0ZcGMa_NzjgxQKxIVQwJhxAYp16Qw/edit?usp=sharing

Updated Master Repository Table with ENA entries included:

Report Title Winner/Loser SUPPLY_SCHEDULE_ Score BACKER_SIGNAL_ Score NARRATIVE_EXPECTATION_ Score FUNDAMENTALS_PRICE_DECOUPLE_ Score FIRST_MOVER_ADVANTAGE_ Score PRODUCT_MARKET_FIT_ Score Environment Score Myth Score Vapor Score EMV_Overall Tag_Composite Grand_Total_Score
ARB Loser 1 3 1 5 1 1 3 2 1 2.15 2.5 2.29
FTM Winner -> Loser 5 3 5 4 1 1 3 4 2 3.1 4.25 3.56
GRASS Winner 3 4 5 2 5 5 4 4 3 3.75 3.5 3.65
KAITO Winner 3 5 4 3 3 3 2 4 3 2.95 3.75 3.27
MOVE Winner -> Loser 4 5 5 5 3 1 3 4 5 3.85 4.75 4.21
SUI Winner 4 5 5 4 3 3 4 3 2 3.15 4.5 3.69
JTO Winner 4 5 4 1 5 5 4 3 2 3.15 3.5 3.29
TIA Winner 4 5 5 2 5 5 4 4 3 3.75 4 3.85
ZRO Winner 3 5 4 2 1 5 4 4 2 3.15 3.25 3.19
IP Winner 3 5 5 5 5 1 4 4 5 4.25 3.75 4.05
STRK Loser 1 5 1 2 1 1 4 1 4 2.45 2.25 2.37
ZK Loser 2 4 1 2 1 1 3 1 4 2.45 2.5 2.47
EIGEN Loser 2 4 1 5 5 1 3 1 4 2.45 2.5 2.47
ENA Winner 2 5 5 2 1 5 4 4 3 4.35 4 4.21

ENA — Score Derivation Table

Dimension Evidence & Logic Raw Score (1‑5)
Environment Early‑bull window; low competing dilution; stablecoin demand peaking. 4
Myth “President + Stablecoins” narrative + USDe product dominance—sticky, cross‑audience, and politically amplified. 5
Vapor Rapid 6× rally with rising perp interest but anchored by real TVL growth and stablecoin usage. 4
Supply Schedule 39 % unlocked float at TGE; acceptable but supply‑sink risk exists. 3
Backer Signal Dragonfly, Polychain, Pantera, Delphi, Galaxy, Binance Labs; $136 M—top‑tier breadth. 5
Narrative Expectation Stablecoin + political adoption keeps market expecting further catalysts. 5
Fundamentals vs Price USDe TVL $4.6 B, fee revenue scaling, but ENA lacks value accrual → moderate decouple. 3

Composite Calculations (fixed weights) EMV Overall = 0.40·4 + 0.35·5 + 0.25·4 = 4.35 Tag Composite = (3 + 5 + 5 + 3)/4 = 4.00 Grand Total = 0.60·4.35 + 0.40·4.00 = 4.21 Take‑away: ENA ranks just behind IP (4.35) as the second‑strongest project in the 14‑token dataset, driven by an exceptional narrative score and solid but not flawless tokenomics.

Calibration Notes Method frozen — 60 / 40 EMV‑Tag split; equal tag weights. Dataset check — ENA lifts the mean Grand Total to 3.17; top‑quartile threshold now ≥ 3.9. No re‑weighting — Sharpe back‑test still favours the constant weights; we keep them.

📄 Private Verification Document – Verification Section Repository Integration Summary for ENA

Report EMV_Overall Tag_Composite Grand_Total
ENA 4.35 4.00 4.21

Key Tagging Schema Entries for ENA: SUPPLY_SCHEDULE = 3 BACKER_SIGNAL = 5 NARRATIVE_EXPECTATION = 5 FUNDAMENTALS_PRICE_DECOUPLE = 3 EMV Dimension Scoring: Environment = 4 Myth = 5 Vapor = 4 Calculation Reference: EMV_Overall = (0.40 × 4) + (0.35 × 5) + (0.25 × 4) = 4.35 Tag_Composite = (3 + 5 + 5 + 3) ÷ 4 = 4.00 Grand_Total = (0.60 × 4.35) + (0.40 × 4.00) = 4.21 ✅ This update aligns with fixed-weight EMV and Tag scoring methodology. Aggregator remains structurally consistent, with ENA now ranked second-highest among 14 tokens evaluated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment