Updated EMV Repository including TIA: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1843mEciZzFqXpNtzq6by7Hkt52phbtSdDeeUDCKGQBg/edit?usp=sharing
Table of Updated EMV Repository including TIA:
| Project | Winner/Loser | Environment Score | Myth Score | Vapor Score | Calibration Data/Notes | Combined Final Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARB | Loser | 3 | 2 | 1 | Already-finished product; constant grant sell-pressure; flat narrative | 28.75 |
| FTM | Winner -> Loser | 3 | 4 | 2 | Sonic hype then post-event dump; clear tech keeps Vapor moderate | 52.5 |
| GRASS | Winner | 4 | 4 | 3 | AI + DePIN mania; low-float TGE; future unlock wave adds Vapor | 68.75 |
| KAITO | Winner | 2 | 4 | 3 | Late-cycle dilution; InfoFi squeeze; utility abstract but linked | 48.75 |
| MOVE | Winner -> Loser | 3 | 4 | 5 | Elite backers + political headlines; no working chain (pure vapor) | 71.25 |
| SUI | Winner | 4 | 3 | 2 | Early-bull scarcity; “shiny new L1” dream; tech talk modest | 53.75 |
| JTO | Winner | 4 | 3 | 2 | Early-cycle Solana liquid staking leader; TVL & price in sync; credible backers; tangible utility keeps Vapor low. | 53.75 |
| TIA | Winner | 4 | 4 | 3 | Staking for airdrop flywheel; modular narrative; scarce float; Tier 1 backers. | 68.75 |
Methodology (unchanged) base = 0.40·Environment + 0.35·Myth + 0.25·Vapor # 1‑to‑5 scale EMV_Final = ((base − 1) / 4) × 100 # 0‑to‑100
Environment (40 %) rates launch climate and liquidity conditions.
Myth (35 %) scores the strength of the forward‑expectations story.
Vapor (25 %) discounts for useful ambiguity or lack of delivery.
This preserves perfect comparability across all entries and lets the composite behave like a percentile‑style ranking (0 = worst, 100 = best). How TIA scored Environment 4 – Launched at the very start of a new alt‑season with top‑tier liquidity and $156 M of elite VC backing.
Myth 4 – “Staking‑for‑future‑airdrops” plus the hazy promise of “modular tech” generated a viral, multi‑month expectations loop.
Vapor 3 – Real staking mechanics and live chain mitigate pure hype, but the tech narrative remains abstract enough to keep some ambiguity.
Plugged into the constant formula, TIA lands at 68.75, matching GRASS for high‑quality, narrative‑rich plays that still carry moderate abstraction risk. No calibration changes were needed—the existing 40 / 35 / 25 weighting continues to map new data smoothly. As you add future reports, I’ll follow exactly the same procedure unless you request an update.
📄 Private Verification Document – Verification Section Excerpt of Updates by Dimension:
| Dimension | TIA Score | Calibration Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Environment | 4 | Launched into early alt-season with strong liquidity conditions and $156M elite VC backing. |
| Myth | 4 | Viral “staking-for-future-airdrops” paired with modular blockchain narrative driving expectations reflexivity. |
| Vapor | 3 | Real staking mechanics and chain activity reduced pure hype but retained abstract tech ambiguity. |
Reflection: Capital-Generation Strategy Impact Integrating TIA’s nuanced EMV scores reinforces my aggregator’s ability to spot future reflexive rally candidates—those combining early-cycle timing, credible narratives, and manageable abstraction risk. This sharpens trade filtering and position sizing for upcoming bull market opportunities, aligning qualitative scoring with capital deployment signals. ✅ All updates are traceable and methodology-consistent, strengthening both back-testing and forward market strategy.