Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@wizbubba1
Last active May 12, 2025 15:34
Show Gist options
  • Save wizbubba1/85d1cb973b443bffd0c4690cad5f9f21 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save wizbubba1/85d1cb973b443bffd0c4690cad5f9f21 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

Updated EMV Repository including TAIKO: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1843mEciZzFqXpNtzq6by7Hkt52phbtSdDeeUDCKGQBg/edit?usp=sharing

Table of Updated EMV Repository including TAIKO:

Project Winner/Loser Environment Score Myth Score Vapor Score Calibration Data/Notes Combined Final Score
ARB Loser 3 2 1 Already-finished product; constant grant sell-pressure; flat narrative 28.75
FTM Winner -> Loser 3 4 2 Sonic hype then post-event dump; clear tech keeps Vapor moderate 52.5
GRASS Winner 4 4 3 AI + DePIN mania; low-float TGE; future unlock wave adds Vapor 68.75
KAITO Winner 2 4 3 Late-cycle dilution; InfoFi squeeze; utility abstract but linked 48.75
MOVE Winner -> Loser 3 4 5 Elite backers + political headlines; no working chain (pure vapor) 71.25
SUI Winner 4 3 2 Early-bull scarcity; “shiny new L1” dream; tech talk modest 53.75
JTO Winner 4 3 2 Early-cycle Solana liquid staking leader; TVL & price in sync; credible backers; tangible utility keeps Vapor low. 53.75
TIA Winner 4 4 3 Staking for airdrop flywheel; modular narrative; scarce float; Tier 1 backers. 68.75
ZRO Winner 4 4 2 Elite VC backing, top bridge volumes; prestige narrative; tangible cross chain messaging tech. 62.5
STRK Loser 4 1 4 Launch timing perfect but narrative vacuum; VC prestige turned to exit‑liquidity fear; usage near‑zero 48.75
ZK Loser 3 1 4 Saturated L2 launch; no narrative retention; governance‑only token creates high Vapor 38.7
EIGEN Loser 3 1 4 Elite TVL & VC backing, but no post‑airdrop narrative; governance‑only token keeps Vapor high 38.75
ENA Winner 4 4 3 Stablecoin PM‑fit + Trump narrative; $136 M tier‑1 funding; governance‑only token leaves moderate Vapor 68.75
TNSR Loser 3 1 4 Peak‑cycle Solana NFT launch; no post‑airdrop myth; governance‑only token (high Vapor) 38.75
USUAL Winner 4 3 4 Stable‑coin + RWA buzzword ignition; $18.5 M tier‑1 funding; no value‑accrual → high Vapor 62.25
TAIKO Loser 3 1 4 Asia‑centric $37 M raise; no post‑airdrop myth; governance‑only token keeps Vapor high 38.75

TAIKO — Environment / Myth / Vapor scores

Token E M V EMV _Final
TAIKO 3 1 4 38.75

Scoring logic

Pillar Reasoning Score
Environment (E) $37 M VC raise, decent early liquidity, but launched with $2.9 B FDV into an already crowded L2 slate. 3
Myth (M) No enduring narrative: “just another ZK‑rollup.” Community interest vanished after the airdrop. 1
Vapor (V) Token is pure governance with no value‑accrual sinks; > 80 % supply locked and minimal on‑chain usage ➜ high ambiguity. 4

Weighted base = 0.40·3 + 0.35·1 + 0.25·4 = 2.55 → EMV _Final = 38.75 (same as ZK & EIGEN, reflecting a low‑myth, high‑vapor profile).

Methodology restated (unchanged) We keep your fixed weighting: Score each pillar 1–5

Environment—launch climate, liquidity, VC calibre.

Myth—strength & durability of forward‑expectations narrative.

Vapor—useful ambiguity vs. delivered utility.

Apply constant weights: 40 % E, 35 % M, 25 % V.

Rescale to 0–100

EMV_Final=(0.40E+0.35M+0.25V−14)×100\text{EMV_Final}= \Bigl(\frac{0.40E + 0.35M + 0.25V - 1}{4}\Bigr)\times100EMV_Final=(40.40E+0.35M+0.25V−1​)×100 Because all three pillars live on the same 1‑to‑5 scale, no extra normalisation is needed; the linear transform simply produces a percentile‑style composite. TAIKO slipped neatly into the existing framework, so no calibration changes were required.

📄 Private Verification Document – Verification Section Aggregator Update Proof: TAIKO Integration Snapshot

Project Environment Myth Vapor EMV_Final
TAIKO 3 1 4 38.75

Summary Notes: Environment = 3 → $37M raise, but $2.9B FDV and highly saturated launch timing.

Myth = 1 → Weak narrative retention post-airdrop; “just another ZK-rollup” stigma.

Vapor = 4 → Token utility minimal, locked supply high, usage shallow. ✅ TAIKO’s integration confirms the aggregator’s consistency in scoring low-myth, high-vapor governance tokens. The EMV methodology required no changes and maintained precision in percentile scoring.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment