Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@wizbubba1
Created May 4, 2025 16:30
Show Gist options
  • Save wizbubba1/c4441172b6ab3d0c3e77df9c8dadf47f to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save wizbubba1/c4441172b6ab3d0c3e77df9c8dadf47f to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

Updated EMV Repository including ZRO: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1843mEciZzFqXpNtzq6by7Hkt52phbtSdDeeUDCKGQBg/edit?usp=sharing

Table of Updated EMV Repository including ZRO:

Project Winner/Loser Environment Score Myth Score Vapor Score Calibration Data/Notes Combined Final Score
ARB Loser 3 2 1 Already-finished product; constant grant sell-pressure; flat narrative 28.75
FTM Winner -> Loser 3 4 2 Sonic hype then post-event dump; clear tech keeps Vapor moderate 52.5
GRASS Winner 4 4 3 AI + DePIN mania; low-float TGE; future unlock wave adds Vapor 68.75
KAITO Winner 2 4 3 Late-cycle dilution; InfoFi squeeze; utility abstract but linked 48.75
MOVE Winner -> Loser 3 4 5 Elite backers + political headlines; no working chain (pure vapor) 71.25
SUI Winner 4 3 2 Early-bull scarcity; “shiny new L1” dream; tech talk modest 53.75
JTO Winner 4 3 2 Early-cycle Solana liquid staking leader; TVL & price in sync; credible backers; tangible utility keeps Vapor low. 53.75
TIA Winner 4 4 3 Staking for airdrop flywheel; modular narrative; scarce float; Tier 1 backers. 68.75
ZRO Winner 4 4 2 Elite VC backing, top bridge volumes; prestige narrative; tangible cross chain messaging tech. 62.5

ZRO scores added

Token E M V EMV _Final
ZRO 4 4 2 62.50

Methodology (unchanged) We continue to apply the fixed 40 % Environment, 35 % Myth, 25 % Vapor weighting, then stretch the weighted‑average from the 1‑to‑5 pillar scale onto a 0‑to‑100 range: base = 0.40·E + 0.35·M + 0.25·V EMV_Final = ((base − 1) / 4) × 100

Environment (E) captures launch climate, liquidity, and funding prowess. Myth (M) measures the strength and durability of forward‑expectations narrative. Vapor (V) discounts for ambiguity or delivery risk. Because the pillars already share a common 1‑5 scale, no extra normalization is required; the transform simply rescales to a percentile‑style metric. How ZRO scored Environment 4 – Raised $318 M from top‑tier VCs (a16z, Coinbase Ventures) and dominated bridge volumes at launch. Myth 4 – “Bridge of the future” prestige narrative with elite partnerships and social proof (700 K+ followers). Vapor 2 – Tangible cross‑chain messaging tech keeps ambiguity low despite governance‑token limitations.

Weighted base = 3.5 → EMV _Final = 62.50, positioning ZRO between GRASS/TIA (high narrative) and SUI/JTO (lower vapor).

Calibration notes No adjustments to the 40 / 35 / 25 weighting were required—the ZRO data fits cleanly within the existing scale, reinforcing that the current formula continues to discriminate effectively across new infrastructure‑token entries. As always, future regressions against forward returns will guide any eventual re‑optimisation, but for now the methodology remains exactly as specified

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment