Inspired by dannyfritz/commit-message-emoji
See also gitmoji.
Commit type | Emoji |
---|---|
Initial commit | 🎉 :tada: |
Version tag | 🔖 :bookmark: |
New feature | ✨ :sparkles: |
Bugfix | 🐛 :bug: |
Inspired by dannyfritz/commit-message-emoji
See also gitmoji.
Commit type | Emoji |
---|---|
Initial commit | 🎉 :tada: |
Version tag | 🔖 :bookmark: |
New feature | ✨ :sparkles: |
Bugfix | 🐛 :bug: |
Hi Nicholas,
I saw you tweet about JSX yesterday. It seemed like the discussion devolved pretty quickly but I wanted to share our experience over the last year. I understand your concerns. I've made similar remarks about JSX. When we started using it Planning Center, I led the charge to write React without it. I don't imagine I'd have much to say that you haven't considered but, if it's helpful, here's a pattern that changed my opinion:
The idea that "React is the V in MVC" is disingenuous. It's a good pitch but, for many of us, it feels like in invitation to repeat our history of coupled views. In practice, React is the V and the C. Dan Abramov describes the division as Smart and Dumb Components. At our office, we call them stateless and container components (view-controllers if we're Flux). The idea is pretty simple: components can't