DarrylErentzen

function string_to_slug(str)	{
	str = str.replace(/^\s+|\s+$/g, ''); // trim
	str = str.toLowerCase();

	// remove accents, swap ñ for n, etc
	var from = "àáäâèéëêìíïîòóöôùúüûñç·/_,:;";
	var to   = "aaaaeeeeiiiioooouuuunc------";

	for (var i=0, l=from.length ; i<l ; i++)
	{

parmentf

Inspired by dannyfritz/commit-message-emoji

See also gitmoji.

Commit type	Emoji
Initial commit	🎉 :tada:
Version tag	🔖 :bookmark:
New feature	✨ :sparkles:
Bugfix	🐛 :bug:

chantastic

Hi Nicholas,

I saw you tweet about JSX yesterday. It seemed like the discussion devolved pretty quickly but I wanted to share our experience over the last year. I understand your concerns. I've made similar remarks about JSX. When we started using it Planning Center, I led the charge to write React without it. I don't imagine I'd have much to say that you haven't considered but, if it's helpful, here's a pattern that changed my opinion:

The idea that "React is the V in MVC" is disingenuous. It's a good pitch but, for many of us, it feels like in invitation to repeat our history of coupled views. In practice, React is the V and the C. Dan Abramov describes the division as Smart and Dumb Components. At our office, we call them stateless and container components (view-controllers if we're Flux). The idea is pretty simple: components can't