Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@JoelLindow
Last active May 20, 2017 21:32
Show Gist options
  • Save JoelLindow/132b8534bf9f643fef75979d53f08591 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save JoelLindow/132b8534bf9f643fef75979d53f08591 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Mod 1b - Project Assessments from Instructors

Jungle Beats

- A Linked List Assignment (Seen in Github Repo https://github.com/JoelLindow/jungle_beats_2)

Assessed By: Sal

Rubric:

1. Fundamental Ruby & Style

  • 3: Application shows strong effort towards organization, content, and refactoring

2. Looping or Recursion

  • 3: Application makes effective use of loop/recursion techniques

3. Test-Driven Development

  • 3: Application is well tested but does not balance isolation and integration tests, using only the data necessary to test the functionality

4. Encapsulation / Breaking Logic into Components

  • 3: Application effectively breaks logical components apart but breaks the principle of SRP

5. Functional Expectations

  • 2: Application runs, but does not work properly, or does not meet specifications.

Night Writer

- An encryption and translation project (https://github.com/JoelLindow/night_writer)

Asssessed By: Mike Dao

Notes from Mike: * working plus extension * 18 tests * Runner files contain too much logic * Depends on instance variables to share information - think of methods as sending and receiving messages * File IO should be pulled out

Rubric:

1. Fundamental Ruby & Style

  • 3: Application shows strong effort towards organization, content, and refactoring

2. Test-Driven Development

  • 2: Application makes use of tests, but the coverage is insufficient

3. Encapsulation / Breaking Logic into Components

  • 3: Application consistently breaks concepts into classes and methods which have appropriate scope and responsibilities (SRP).

4. Functional Expectations

  • 4: Application meets all requirements, and implements one extension properly.

Feedback for Paired Partner of Night Writer: Nate Giesing

Nate,

I wanted to reach out and offer some feedback on our recent project together, NightWriter. I want you to know that I truly appreciated your participation in the project and enjoyed getting to know you. You had mentioned your intimidation when it came to the task of writing this program. Upon further discussion you had even mentioned that you fealt inadequate in many ways. I want to assure you that these feelings are feelings I also experience when taking on large projects. However, I encourage you to focus on contributing where you are able to, just as you did with this project. It's not about who writes the bulk of the code as much as it is about two partners equally engaging their minds toward a common goal. Becasue you were able to engage in such a way, we were able to succeed. Great work. I would encourage you to keep working on your core type exercises, mythical creatures and also pairing with others in the community who simply have more experience. You are growing quickly and it shows. I am proud of you and the efforts you are making to continue to grow. Please let me know if there's any way I can support you in the future or if you have any exciting ideas you'd like to share along the way.

Your partner, Joel Lindow Software Developer


Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment