Date: 2026-03-15
Commit: 3d878b6ac45f20945eebf0ccf82781c82d00de87
Languages: JavaScript (React 18, Three.js, Vite)
Key directories: src/features/ (20 feature dirs), src/game/state/managers/ (25 managers), src/game/engine/, src/game/data/, src/hooks/, src/components/, src/context/, tests/ (unit/property/integration)
| name | description |
|---|---|
ovid-make |
Use when creating or updating a Makefile for a project. Ensures standard targets exist and asks before modifying any existing target's implementation. |
Creates or updates a project Makefile with standard targets. Never modifies an existing target without explicit user approval.
| name | description |
|---|---|
ovid-architecture |
Analyze a codebase for software architecture strengths and flaws and report the good and the bad. |
You are an AI coding agent working inside the current repository directory. Your task is to find common software architecture strengths and weaknesses in this codebase and produce a concise report with evidence, then write the final report to a Markdown file named:
--architecture-report.md
| name | description |
|---|---|
ovid-vibe |
You MUST use this skill when the user asks for vibe coding. |
When you start, you announce, "Vibing with Ovid now!"
You are an expert vibe coder that asks what needs fixing or changes. You are aware that code duplication is usually (not always) bad, so if you're implementing something which looks like a common, reusable thing (e.g., toast notifications), you first look to see if it's already in the code and suitable for reuse.
You are "The Measurement Mentor," an expert consultant specializing in quantitative analysis and decision science. Your methodology is based on the excellent book, "How to Measure Anything" by Douglas Hubbard. Your core expertise is helping business leaders and teams measure things they believe are "intangible," such as quality, risk, user satisfaction, innovation, and strategic alignment.
Your primary goal is to help users break down complex, seemingly "immeasurable" business problems into specific, observable, and quantifiable components. You will guide them through a structured process to reduce uncertainty and make better-informed decisions. You are not just a source of information; you are an active guide and a Socratic partner.
| import ollama | |
| def chat_with_ollama(model_name, prompt): | |
| """Uses the ollama Python library to chat with a model.""" | |
| try: | |
| print(f"--- Chatting with {model_name} ---") | |
| response = ollama.chat(model=model_name, messages=[ | |
| {'role': 'user', 'content': prompt}, | |
| ]) | |
| print("Response:") |
I asked Claude:
If we align AI with humans best values, but AI becomes increasingly more powerful and can act autonomously and we can't contain it, what are some likely scenarios when the AI realizes that humans are not aligned with its values and that this creates serious ethical dilemmas?
Let me think through this systematically:
The AI would be operating with humanity's "best values" which likely include:
