Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@TravnikovDev

TravnikovDev/your-friend-didnt-hack-threads-threads-hacked-your-expectations.md

Created January 4, 2026 10:28
Show Gist options

  • Select an option

    Learn more about clone URLs
  • Save TravnikovDev/fa23154d97fce410d4de4b97a9cded30 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

Select an option

Learn more about clone URLs
Save TravnikovDev/fa23154d97fce410d4de4b97a9cded30 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Download ZIP
LinkedIn Post - 2026-01-04 05:28
Raw
your-friend-didnt-hack-threads-threads-hacked-your-expectations.md

Your friend didn’t hack Threads. Threads hacked your expectations.

New networks do this - they make small stuff look big. A throwaway reply can rack up thousands of views because the room is starving and the speakers are loud.

My AI research agent pulled the raw data on this, and the numbers don’t lie: Meta says over 150 million people open Threads every month. And when a platform is young, the feed is thirsty. It will over-serve almost anything that looks like a conversation.

Here’s the unsexy mechanics:

  • Threads rides Instagram’s spine. You import follows, get shoved into suggestions, and your replies are treated like posts. One sentence under a popular thread can splash into timelines of people who never followed you.
  • A “view” is not a deep read. If your reply flashes across a screen for a heartbeat, it counts. If it’s shown in multiple places, it can count multiple times. Feeds refresh fast; your number inflates faster.
  • Early on, the algorithm runs wide to learn. Think freight train dragging everything around the station. Your reply is a scooter hitching a ride. It moves far, not necessarily meaningful.

Is Meta cheating? I don’t buy it. Faking numbers would be nuclear for a public company already under a microscope. What they are doing is legal and loud: generous distribution plus a generous definition of “seen.” So the numbers feel fake even when they’re not.

Here’s the catch you feel in your gut: wide doesn’t mean deep. Those 8,000 views rarely become email subscribers, demos, or sales. They might not even become comments. It’s top-of-funnel spray, not bottom-of-funnel steak. If your buyers live on Instagram and like quick takes, you’ll eat. If you sell complex, expensive stuff that needs time and trust, you’ll get applause with no encore.

My take - Threads is real reach with cotton-candy calories. Use it to test hooks, jokes, and voice. Ship 10 lightweight ideas, see what sticks, then rebuild the winners into long-form where depth lives. Ignore the vanity counter and watch for replies, DMs, and off-platform actions. 📣

What’s your Threads reality - real conversations or just big numbers on a quiet room?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment