By default, Rails applications build URLs based on the primary key -- the id
column from the database. Imagine we have a Person
model and associated controller. We have a person record for Bob Martin
that has id
number 6
. The URL for his show page would be:
/people/6
But, for aesthetic or SEO purposes, we want Bob's name in the URL. The last segment, the 6
here, is called the "slug". Let's look at a few ways to implement better slugs.
The simplest approach is to override the to_param
method in the Person
model. Whenever we call a route helper like this:
person_path(@person)
Rails will call to_param
to convert the object to a slug for the URL. If your model does not define this method then it will use the implementation in ActiveRecord::Base
which just returns the id
.
For this method to succeed, it's critical that all links use the ActiveRecord
object rather than calling id
. Don't ever do this:
person_path(@person.id) # Bad!
Instead, always pass the object:
person_path(@person.id)
Instead, in the model, we can override to_param
to include a parameterized version of the person's name:
class Person < ActiveRecord::Base
def to_param
[id, name.parameterize].join("-")
end
end
For our user Bob Martin
with id
number 6
, this will generate a slug 6-bob_martin
. The full URL would be:
/people/6-bob-martin
The parameterize
method from ActiveSupport
will deal with converting any characters that aren't valid for a URL.
What do we need to change about our finders? Nothing! When we call Person.find(x)
, the parameter x
is converted to an integer to perform the SQL lookup. Check out how to_i
deals with strings which have a mix of letters and numbers:
> "1".to_i
# => 1
> "1-with-words".to_i
# => 1
> "1-2345".to_i
# => 1
> "6-bob-martin".to_i
# => 6
The to_i
method will stop interpreting the string as soon as it hits a non-digit. Since our implementation of to_param
always has the id
at the front followed by a hyphen, it will always do lookups based on just the id
and discard the rest of the slug.
We've added content to the slug which will improve SEO and make our URLs more readable.
One limitation is that the users cannot manipulate the URL in any meaningful way. Knowing the url 6-bob-martin
doesn't allow you to guess the url 7-russ-olsen
, you still need to know the ID.
And the numeric ID is still in the URL. If this is something you want to obfuscate, then the simple scheme doesn't help.
Sometimes you want to get away from the ID all together and use another attribute in the database for lookup. Imagine we have a Tag
object that has a name
column. The name would be something like ruby
or rails
.
Creating links can again override to_param
:
class Tag < ActiveRecord::Base
validates_uniqueness_of :name
def to_param
name
end
end
Now when we call tag_path(@tag)
we'd get a URL like /tags/ruby
.
The lookup is harder, though. When a request comes in to /tags/ruby
the ruby
will be stored in params[:id]
. A typical controller will call Tag.find(params[:id])
, essentially Tag.find("ruby")
, and it will fail.
Instead, we can modify the controller to Tag.find_by_name(params[:id])
. It will work, but it's bad object-oriented design. We're breaking the encapsulation of the Tag
class.
The DRY Principle says that a piece of knowledge should have a single representation in a system. In this implementation of tags, the idea of "A tag can be found by its name" has now been represented in the to_param
of the model and the controller lookup. That's a maintenance headache.
In our model we could define a custom finder:
class Tag < ActiveRecord::Base
validates_uniqueness_of :name
def to_param
name
end
def self.find_by_param(input)
find_by_name(input)
end
end
Then in the controller call Tag.find_by_param(params[:id])
. This layer of abstraction means that only the model knows exactly how a Tag
is converted to and from a parameter. The encapsulation is restored.
But we have to remember to use Tag.find_by_param
instead of Tag.find
everywhere. Especially if you're retrofitting the friendly ID onto an existing system, this can be a significant effort.
Instead of implementing the custom finder, we could override the find
method:
class Tag < ActiveRecord::Base
#...
def self.find(input)
find_by_name(input)
end
end
It will work when you pass in a name slug, but will break when a numeric ID is passed in. How could we handle both?
The first temptation is to do some type switching:
class Tag < ActiveRecord::Base
#...
def self.find(input)
if input.is_a?(Integer)
super
else
find_by_name(input)
end
end
end
That'll work, but checking type is very against the Ruby ethos. Writing is_a?
should always make you ask "Is there a better way?"
Yes, based on these facts:
- Databases give the
id
of1
to the first record - Ruby converts strings starting with a letter to
0
class Tag < ActiveRecord::Base
#...
def self.find(input)
if input.to_i != 0
super
else
find_by_name(input)
end
end
end
Or, condensed down with a ternary:
class Tag < ActiveRecord::Base
#...
def self.find(input)
input.to_i == 0 ? find_by_name(input) : super
end
end
Our goal is achieved, but we've introduced a possible bug: if a name starts with a digit it will look like an ID. If it's acceptable to our business domain, we can add a validation that names cannot start with a digit:
class Tag < ActiveRecord::Base
#...
validates_format_of :name, :without => /^\d/
def self.find(input)
input.to_i == 0 ? find_by_name(input) : super
end
end
Now everything should work great!
Does implementing two additional methods seem like a pain? Or, more seriously, are you going to implement this kind of functionality in multiple models of your application? Then it might be worth checking out the FriendlyID gem: https://github.com/norman/friendly_id
The gem is just about to hit a 4.0 version. As of this writing, you want to use the beta. In your Gemfile
:
gem "friendly_id", "~> 4.0.0.beta8"
Then run bundle
from the command line.
The minimum configuration in your model is:
class Tag < ActiveRecord::Base
extend FriendlyId
friendly_id :name
end
This will allow you to use the name
column or the id
for lookups using find
, just like we did before.
But the library does a great job of maintaining a dedicated slug column for you. If we were dealing with articles, for instance, we don't want to generate the slug over and over. More importantly, we'll want to store the slug in the database to be queried directly.
The library defaults to a String
column named slug
. If you have that column, you can use the :slugged
option to automatically generate and store the slug:
class Tag < ActiveRecord::Base
extend FriendlyId
friendly_id :name, :use => :slugged
end
You can see it in action here:
> t = Tag.create(:name => "Ruby on Rails")
# => #<Tag id: 16, name: "Ruby on Rails", created_at: "2011-09-11 15:42:53", updated_at: "2011-09-11 15:42:53", slug: "ruby-on-rails">
> Tag.find 16
# => #<Tag id: 16, name: "Ruby on Rails", created_at: "2011-09-11 15:42:53", updated_at: "2011-09-11 15:42:53", slug: "ruby-on-rails">
> Tag.find "ruby-on-rails"
# => #<Tag id: 16, name: "Ruby on Rails", created_at: "2011-09-11 15:42:53", updated_at: "2011-09-11 15:42:53", slug: "ruby-on-rails">
> t.to_param
# => "ruby-on-rails"
We can use .find
with an ID or the slug transparently. When the object is converted to a parameter for links, we'll get the slug with no ID number. We get good encapsulation, easy usage, improved SEO and easy to read URLs.
@abitdodgy If you do something like
User.find(params[:id])
, that will pass in a String. Which will work withinput.to_i
, but obviously notinput.is_a? Integer