alan-morey

Salesforce package.xml

xmlstarlet sel -t -m _:Package/_:types -s A:T:U _:name -n -v _:name -n -m _:members -s A:T:U . -v "concat(' - ', .)" -n package.xml

xmlstarlet sel -t -m _:Package/_:types -s A:T:U _:name -m _:members -s A:T:U . -v "concat(../_:name, '::', .)" -n package.xml

alan-morey

Keybase proof

I hereby claim:

• I am alan-morey on github.
• I am alanmorey (https://keybase.io/alanmorey) on keybase.
• I have a public key ASC_PfYGuMi76Hro7GXR8FQJowknG2Za0s0RWmEZaELM3wo

To claim this, I am signing this object:

alan-morey

class SetupAuditTrails {
    public Map<String, Set<String>> getModifiedClassesSince(Id sinceTrailId) {
        return getModifiedClassesSince(sinceDate(sinceTrailId));
    }

    public Map<String, Set<String>> getModifiedClassesSince(DateTime sinceDate) {
        Map<String, Set<String>> changes = new Map<String, Set<String>>();
        
        for (SetupAuditTrail t : [
            SELECT display

alan-morey

public abstract class AnonApp implements MainMethod {
    final String[] OUT = new String[0];
    
    public static void run(Type clazz) {
        AnonApp app = (AnonApp) clazz.newInstance();
        app.run();
    }
    
    public void run() {
    	try {

alan-morey

public class Uuid {
    static final String GROUP_SEP = '-';
    
    Uuid() {}
    
    public static String randomUuid() {
        String hex = EncodingUtil.convertToHex(Crypto.generateAesKey(128));
        
        return String.join(new String[] {
            hex.substring(0,8),

alan-morey

// Unexpected results for System.hashCode() when using same values for Salesforce IDs with different reference types.
// 
// https://www.salesforce.com/us/developer/docs/apexcode/Content/apex_methods_system_system.htm?CSHID=apex_methods_system_system.htm#apex_system_system_hashcode
//
// API v33
@isTest
class SystemHashCodeBugTest {
    static final String STR_VAL = 'foobar';
    static final Id USER_ID_VAL = UserInfo.getUserId();
    static final Id LITERAL_ID_VAL = '001000000000001';

alan-morey

// Apex seems to have a bug when trying to represent the minimum value for both
// Long and Integer primitive types as a literal value.
//
//Long MIN_LONG = -9223372036854775808L; // Compile Error: Invalid Long: 9223372036854775808L
//Integer MIN_INT = -2147483648; // Compile Error: Invalid Integer: 2147483648
    
// Workaround: Overflow the MAX values
Long LONG_MAX_VALUE = 9223372036854775807L;
Long LONG_MIN_VALUE = LONG_MAX_VALUE + 1; // Overflow => -9223372036854775808L
    

alan-morey

public class PairNumbers {
    Integer x,y;

    public PairNumbers(Integer a, Integer b) {
        x=a;
        y=b;
    }

    public Boolean equals(Object obj) {
        if (obj != null && obj instanceof PairNumbers) {

alan-morey

/**
 * Salesforce does not allow the ability to write to certain SObject fields
 * such as LastModifiedDate, CreatedDate etc. Even if those objects are
 * not going to be inserted into the DB. This makes testing around these
 * fields difficult as we always need to hit the database to load these values
 * and it's not possible to inject the values you require.
 * 
 * This method gets around that limitation by using JSON. We first create
 * a representation of the data as a map of fields/values pairs. Then we
 * transform the map into a JSON representation. This respresentation includes

alan-morey

@isTest
public class TestSpy {
    public static final String UNKNOWN = '<unknown>';
    public static final String VOID_RETURN_TYPE = '<void>';

    String methodName;
    List<Object[]> callArgs;

    Exception throwResult;
    Boolean isVoidReturn = true;