Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

View bdrum's full-sized avatar
🦁
Unus sed leo

Boris Rumyantsev bdrum

🦁
Unus sed leo
View GitHub Profile
@Zearin
Zearin / python_decorator_guide.md
Last active November 15, 2024 16:12
The best explanation of Python decorators I’ve ever seen. (An archived answer from StackOverflow.)

NOTE: This is a question I found on StackOverflow which I’ve archived here, because the answer is so effing phenomenal.


Q: How can I make a chain of function decorators in Python?


If you are not into long explanations, see [Paolo Bergantino’s answer][2].

@sstirlin
sstirlin / vim_bindings_ipython.md
Last active November 15, 2024 22:48
vim bindings for IPython

As of IPython 5, readline is no longer used to interpret keystrokes.
Instead, the pure-python library prompt_toolkit is used.

Getting vim mode in IPython is straightforward. First, edit

~/.ipython/profile_default/ipython_config.py

and add the following line:

c.TerminalInteractiveShell.editing_mode = 'vi'

@GLMeece
GLMeece / latency_numbers.md
Last active May 22, 2024 15:57
Latency Numbers Every Programmer Should Know - MarkDown Fork

Latency Comparison Numbers

Note: "Forked" from Latency Numbers Every Programmer Should Know

Event Nanoseconds Microseconds Milliseconds Comparison
L1 cache reference 0.5 - - -
Branch mispredict 5.0 - - -
L2 cache reference 7.0 - - 14x L1 cache
Mutex lock/unlock 25.0 - - -
@mbinna
mbinna / effective_modern_cmake.md
Last active November 13, 2024 23:24
Effective Modern CMake

Effective Modern CMake

Getting Started

For a brief user-level introduction to CMake, watch C++ Weekly, Episode 78, Intro to CMake by Jason Turner. LLVM’s CMake Primer provides a good high-level introduction to the CMake syntax. Go read it now.

After that, watch Mathieu Ropert’s CppCon 2017 talk Using Modern CMake Patterns to Enforce a Good Modular Design (slides). It provides a thorough explanation of what modern CMake is and why it is so much better than “old school” CMake. The modular design ideas in this talk are based on the book [Large-Scale C++ Software Design](https://www.amazon.de/Large-Scale-Soft

@Garfounkel
Garfounkel / ProgressBarDecorator.py
Last active March 15, 2024 16:31
A python decorator that prints a progress bar when a decored function yields it's current progress.
import time
import sys
class ProgressBarPrinter:
def __init__(self, width, step, stream, fname):
self.width = width
self.block_progress = 0
self.current_progress = 0
self.start_time = time.time()
"""Pseudocode description of the AlphaZero algorithm."""
from __future__ import google_type_annotations
from __future__ import division
import math
import numpy
import tensorflow as tf
from typing import List
@romainl
romainl / Don't use Vim.md
Last active November 4, 2024 04:33
Don't use Vim for the wrong reasons

Don't use Vim

Don't do the crime, if you can't do the time.

-- Anthony Vincenzo "Tony" Baretta

Vim is an amazing text editor. I love it. Really, I wouldn't [organize][organize] a Vim advent calendar if I didn't. But, as amazing as it is, Vim is not for everyone. It can't solve all your problems, or be a TUI version of your favorite IDE, or make you a better programmer, or land you that dream job in the Bay Area. But Vim can help you be more mindful, focused, and efficient, as long as you approach it with the right mindset.

Don't get me wrong, I certainly welcome you to try Vim, but I'm not a proselyte. I don't thrive on newbies. I just want you to use the right tool for the job and not waste your—and anyone's—time on a fruitless quest.

@probonopd
probonopd / Wayland.md
Last active November 15, 2024 01:20
Think twice about Wayland. It breaks everything!

Think twice before abandoning Xorg. Wayland breaks everything!

Hence, if you are interested in existing applications to "just work" without the need for adjustments, then you may be better off avoiding Wayland.

Wayland solves no issues I have but breaks almost everything I need. Even the most basic, most simple things (like xkill) - in this case with no obvious replacement. And usually it stays broken, because the Wayland folks mostly seem to care about Automotive, Gnome, maybe KDE - and alienating everyone else (e.g., people using just an X11 window manager or something like GNUstep) in the process.

The Wayland project seems to operate like they were starting a greenfield project, whereas at the same time they try to position Wayland as "the X11 successor", which would clearly require a lot of thought about not breaking, or at least providing a smooth upgrade path for, existing software.

In fact, it is merely an incompatible alternative, and not e