-
-
Save bendc/1e6af8f2d8027f2965da to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
const letters = (() => { | |
const caps = [...Array(26)].map((val, i) => String.fromCharCode(i + 65)); | |
return caps.concat(caps.map(letter => letter.toLowerCase())); | |
})(); |
Savior
Brilliant :). Thanks
amazing, tysm
@kwiniarski97
God bless you
Take my money!
The hero we don't deserve
da real MVP!
WorldWide Legend
Java:
char[] uppercaseAlphabet = {'A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F', 'G', 'H', 'I', 'J', 'K', 'L', 'M', 'N', 'O', 'P', 'Q', 'R', 'S', 'T', 'U', 'V', 'W', 'X', 'Y', 'Z'};
As we speak about JavaScript, SlexAxton anwer is the best, coz strings act like arrays in JavaScript, so you can do:
const letters = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz";
const letter = letters[0]; // "A"
const randomLetter = letters[Math.floor(Math.random() * letters.length)]; // random letter ;)
They act like arrays thank to temporary object created upon this methods use. You may consider performance issues in some cases.
["A", "B", "C", "D", "E", "F", "G", "H", "I", "J", "K", "L", "M", "N", "O", "P", "Q", "R", "S", "T", "U", "V", "W", "X", "Y", "Z", "a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f", "g", "h", "i", "j", "k", "l", "m", "n", "o", "p", "q", "r", "s", "t", "u", "v", "w", "x", "y", "z"]
thanks!
["A", "B", "C", "D", "E", "F", "G", "H", "I", "J", "K", "L", "M", "N", "O", "P", "Q", "R", "S", "T", "U", "V", "W", "X", "Y", "Z", "a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f", "g", "h", "i", "j", "k", "l", "m", "n", "o", "p", "q", "r", "s", "t", "u", "v", "w", "x", "y", "z"]
god bless america
characters type of this array for java, C, C++ fans
{
'A','B','C','D','E','F','G','H','I','J','K','L','M','N','O','P','Q','R','S','T','U','V','W','X','Y','Z',
'a','b','c','d','e','f','g','h','i','j','k','l','m','n','o','p','q','r','s','t','u','v','w','x','y','z',
};
if yall need it with 0-9 added: [ "A", "B", "C", "D", "E", "F", "G", "H", "I", "J", "K", "L", "M", "N", "O", "P", "Q", "R", "S", "T", "U", "V", "W", "X", "Y", "Z", "a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f", "g", "h", "i", "j", "k", "l", "m", "n", "o", "p", "q", "r", "s", "t", "u", "v", "w", "x", "y", "z", "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", ]
var specials = ["!", "@", "#", "$", "%", "^", "&", "*", "(", ")", "+", "-", ".", "`", "~", "|", "<", ">", "=", "-", "_"]
String.fromCharCode(...Array(123).keys()).slice(97)
Just leaving this here if anyone needs...
const alphabet = {
a: 0,
b: 1,
c: 2,
d: 3,
e: 4,
f: 5,
g: 6,
h: 7,
i: 8,
j: 9,
k: 10,
l: 11,
m: 12,
n: 13,
o: 14,
p: 15,
q: 16,
r: 17,
s: 18,
t: 19,
u: 20,
v: 21,
w: 22,
x: 23,
y: 24,
z: 25,
};
Just leaving this here if anyone needs...
const alphabet = { a: 0, b: 1, c: 2, d: 3, e: 4, f: 5, g: 6, h: 7, i: 8, j: 9, k: 10, l: 11, m: 12, n: 13, o: 14, p: 15, q: 16, r: 17, s: 18, t: 19, u: 20, v: 21, w: 22, x: 23, y: 24, z: 25, };
If this was an array anybody could get the infexOf any character they want.
const lowerCaseLetters = ['a', 'b','c', 'd', 'e', 'f', 'g', 'h', 'i', 'j', 'k', 'l', 'm', 'n', 'o', 'p', 'q', 'r', 's','t', 'u', 'v', 'w', 'x', 'y', 'z'];
const upperCaseLetters = ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F', 'G', 'H', 'I', 'J', 'K', 'L', 'M', 'N', 'O', 'P', 'Q', 'R', 'S', 'T', 'U', 'V', 'W', 'X', 'Y', 'Z'];
const numbersZeroToNine = ['0', '1', '2', '3', '4', '5', '6', '7', '8', '9'];
const selectedSpecialCharacters = ['!', '@', '#', '$', '%', '^', '&', '*', '(', ')', '+', '-', '.', '~', '|', '<', '>', '=', '-', '_', '/', ':', ';', '?', '[', ']', '{', '}', '~'];
see also https://owasp.org/www-community/password-special-characters for a longer list of special characters (including ", ', `, \, and space)
Just leaving this here if anyone needs...
const alphabet = { a: 0, b: 1, c: 2, d: 3, e: 4, f: 5, g: 6, h: 7, i: 8, j: 9, k: 10, l: 11, m: 12, n: 13, o: 14, p: 15, q: 16, r: 17, s: 18, t: 19, u: 20, v: 21, w: 22, x: 23, y: 24, z: 25, };
If this was an array anybody could get the infexOf any character they want.
True but that wouldn't be as efficient as an O(1)
lookup as is the case with an object. I used the above in a leetcode problem so time complexity was a concern.
Just leaving this here if anyone needs...
const alphabet = { a: 0, b: 1, c: 2, d: 3, e: 4, f: 5, g: 6, h: 7, i: 8, j: 9, k: 10, l: 11, m: 12, n: 13, o: 14, p: 15, q: 16, r: 17, s: 18, t: 19, u: 20, v: 21, w: 22, x: 23, y: 24, z: 25, };
If this was an array anybody could get the infexOf any character they want.
True but that wouldn't be as efficient as an
O(1)
lookup as is the case with an object. I used the above in a leetcode problem so time complexity was a concern.
in what case would you need to get the indexOf a character if your using an object anyways?
Just leaving this here if anyone needs...
const alphabet = { a: 0, b: 1, c: 2, d: 3, e: 4, f: 5, g: 6, h: 7, i: 8, j: 9, k: 10, l: 11, m: 12, n: 13, o: 14, p: 15, q: 16, r: 17, s: 18, t: 19, u: 20, v: 21, w: 22, x: 23, y: 24, z: 25, };
If this was an array anybody could get the infexOf any character they want.
True but that wouldn't be as efficient as an
O(1)
lookup as is the case with an object. I used the above in a leetcode problem so time complexity was a concern.in what case would you need to get the indexOf a character if your using an object anyways?
Plenty of string problems on Leetcode has this need. Although for most it would be starting at 1 not 0 like the original snippet I posted. Anyway since then I found a easier way to do this:
// If you need to map alphabets to their corresponding index
"a".charCodeAt() - 96; // 1
"z".charCodeAt() - 96; // 26
Just leaving this here if anyone needs...
const alphabet = { a: 0, b: 1, c: 2, d: 3, e: 4, f: 5, g: 6, h: 7, i: 8, j: 9, k: 10, l: 11, m: 12, n: 13, o: 14, p: 15, q: 16, r: 17, s: 18, t: 19, u: 20, v: 21, w: 22, x: 23, y: 24, z: 25, };
If this was an array anybody could get the infexOf any character they want.
True but that wouldn't be as efficient as an
O(1)
lookup as is the case with an object. I used the above in a leetcode problem so time complexity was a concern.in what case would you need to get the indexOf a character if your using an object anyways?
Plenty of string problems on Leetcode has this need. Although for most it would be starting at 1 not 0 like the original snippet I posted. Anyway since then I found a easier way to do this:
// If you need to map alphabets to their corresponding index "a".charCodeAt() - 96; // 1 "z".charCodeAt() - 96; // 26
interesting thanks
std::map<std::string,int> cc_map {{"A",0}, {"B",0}, {"C",0}, {"D",0}, {"E",0}, {"F",0}, {"G",0}, {"H",0}, {"I",0}, {"J",0}, {"K",0}, {"L",0}, {"M",0},
{"N",0}, {"O",0}, {"P",0}, {"Q",0}, {"R",0}, {"S",0}, {"T",0}, {"U",0}, {"V",0}, {"W",0}, {"X",0}, {"Y",0}, {"Z",0},
{"a",0}, {"b",0}, {"c",0}, {"d",0}, {"e",0}, {"f",0}, {"g",0}, {"h",0}, {"i",0}, {"j",0}, {"k",0}, {"l",0}, {"m",0},
{"n",0}, {"o",0}, {"p",0}, {"q",0}, {"r",0}, {"s",0}, {"t",0}, {"u",0}, {"v",0}, {"w",0}, {"x",0}, {"y",0}, {"z",0},
{"0",0},{"1",0},{"2",0},{"3",0},{"4",0},{"5",0},{"6",0},{"7",0},{"8",0},{"9",0},
{"!",0}, {"@",0}, {"#",0}, {"$",0}, {"%",0}, {"^",0}, {"&",0}, {"*",0}, {"(",0}, {")",0}, {"+",0}, {"-",0}, {".",0},
{"~",0}, {"|",0}, {"<",0}, {">",0}, {"=",0}, {"-",0}, {"_",0}, {"/",0}, {":",0}, {";",0}, {"?",0}, {"[",0}, {"]",0},
{"{",0}, {"}",0}, {"~",0},};
leaving this here in case anyone else needs this.
["A", "B", "C", "D", "E", "F", "G", "H", "I", "J", "K", "L", "M", "N", "O", "P", "Q", "R", "S", "T", "U", "V", "W", "X", "Y", "Z", "a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f", "g", "h", "i", "j", "k", "l", "m", "n", "o", "p", "q", "r", "s", "t", "u", "v", "w", "x", "y", "z"]
exactly what I needed Thx
["A", "B", "C", "D", "E", "F", "G", "H", "I", "J", "K", "L", "M", "N", "O", "P", "Q", "R", "S", "T", "U", "V", "W", "X", "Y", "Z", "a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f", "g", "h", "i", "j", "k", "l", "m", "n", "o", "p", "q", "r", "s", "t", "u", "v", "w", "x", "y", "z"]
W mans
Legend
In case anyone needs the full set of lower and upper case Latin characters (all of the various accented versions), built from this table:
const lowercaseString = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzàáâãäåæçèéêëìíîïðñòóôõöøùúûüýþÿāăąćĉċčďđēĕėęěĝğġģĥħĩīĭįıijĵķĺļľŀłńņňŋōŏőœŕŗřśŝşšţťŧũūŭůűųŵŷźżžƃƅƈƌƒƙơƣƥƨƭưƴƶƹƽdžljnjǎǐǒǔǖǘǚǜǟǡǣǥǧǩǫǭǯdzǵǻǽǿȁȃȅȇȉȋȍȏȑȓȕȗɓɔɗɘəɛɠɣɨɩɯɲɵʃʈʊʋʒḁḃḅḇḉḋḍḏḑḓḕḗḙḛḝḟḡḣḥḧḩḫḭḯḱḳḵḷḹḻḽḿṁṃṅṇṉṋṍṏṑṓṕṗṙṛṝṟṡṣṥṧṩṫṭṯṱṳṵṷṹṻṽṿẁẃẅẇẉẋẍẏẑẓẕạảấầẩẫậắằẳẵặẹẻẽếềểễệỉịọỏốồổỗộớờởỡợụủứừửữựỳỵỷỹ";
const lowercaseChars = [...lowercaseString];
const uppercaseChars = [...lowercaseString.toLocaleUpperCase()];
Upper and lowercase for c:
{'a', 'b','c', 'd', 'e', 'f', 'g', 'h', 'i', 'j', 'k', 'l', 'm', 'n', 'o', 'p', 'q', 'r', 's','t', 'u', 'v', 'w', 'x', 'y', 'z', 'A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F', 'G', 'H', 'I', 'J', 'K', 'L', 'M', 'N', 'O', 'P', 'Q', 'R', 'S', 'T', 'U', 'V', 'W', 'X', 'Y', 'Z'}
@kwiniarski97
thanks