Every single JavaScript engine supports standard timers *
These accept one or more extra argument by specs
for(var i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
setTimeout(function (i) {
console.log(i);
}, 0, i); // <== see this?
}
/* bling.js */ | |
window.$ = document.querySelectorAll.bind(document); | |
Node.prototype.on = window.on = function (name, fn) { | |
this.addEventListener(name, fn); | |
}; | |
NodeList.prototype.__proto__ = Array.prototype; |
Every single JavaScript engine supports standard timers *
These accept one or more extra argument by specs
for(var i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
setTimeout(function (i) {
console.log(i);
}, 0, i); // <== see this?
}
// please comment if you know of other BOOKS (not considering blogs just yet) on ES6 that are out or coming out
Native HTML controls are a challenge to style. You can style any element in the web platform that uses Shadow DOM with a pseudo element ::pseudo-element
or the /deep/
path selector.
video::webkit-media-controls-timeline {
background-color: lime;
}
video /deep/ input[type=range] {
Jake Archibald (@jaffathecake): The ServiceWorker is coming; look busy
https://speakerdeck.com/jaffathecake/the-serviceworker-is-coming-look-busy
https://github.com/jakearchibald/trained-to-thrill/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmZ9XcTpMS4
Hunter Loftis (@hunterloftis): We Will All Be Game Progmrammers
http://wwabgp.herokuapp.com/s
http://youtu.be/QX0eauXBKwc
CarterRabasa (@carterrabasa): A Community of People; Not Projects
(by @andrestaltz)
If you prefer to watch video tutorials with live-coding, then check out this series I recorded with the same contents as in this article: Egghead.io - Introduction to Reactive Programming.
{ | |
// The block has begun, we're in a new block scope. The TDZ for the "a" binding has begun | |
var f = function() { | |
// 2. Because f() is evaluated before `a` is actually declared, | |
// an exception will be thrown indicating to the author that | |
// `a` is not yet defined. | |
console.log(a); | |
}; | |
These are all the JSConf 2014 slides, codes, and notes I was able to cull together from twitter. Thanks to the speakers who posted them and thanks to @chantastic for posting his wonderful notes.
Google Chrome Developers says:
The new WOFF 2.0 Web Font compression format offers a 30% average gain over WOFF 1.0 (up to 50%+ in some cases). WOFF 2.0 is available since Chrome 36 and Opera 23.
Some examples of file size differences: WOFF vs. WOFF2