Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@davfre
Last active August 4, 2024 03:10
Show Gist options
  • Save davfre/8596159 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save davfre/8596159 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
SAM and BAM filtering oneliners

SAM and BAM filtering one-liners

@author: David Fredman, [email protected] (sans poly-A tail)
@dependencies: http://sourceforge.net/projects/bamtools/ and http://samtools.sourceforge.net/

Please extend with additional/faster/better solutions via a pull request!

BWA mapping (using piping for minimal disk I/O)

bwa aln -t 8 targetGenome.fa reads.fastq | bwa samse targetGenome.fa - reads.fastq\
| samtools view -bt targetGenome.fa - | samtools sort - reads.bwa.targetGenome

samtools index reads.bwa.targetGenome.bam

Count number of records (unmapped reads + each aligned location per mapped read) in a bam file:

samtools view -c filename.bam

Count with flagstat for additional information:

samtools flagstat filename.bam

Count the number of alignments (reads mapping to multiple locations counted multiple times)

samtools view -F 0x04 -c filename.bam

Count number of mapped reads (not mapped locations) for left and right mate in read pairs

samtools view -F 0x40 filename.bam | cut -f1 | sort | uniq | wc -l
samtools view -f 0x40 -F 0x4 filename.bam | cut -f1 | sort | uniq | wc -l #left mate
samtools view -f 0x80 -F 0x4 filename.bam | cut -f1 | sort | uniq  | wc -l #right mate

Remove unmapped reads, keep the mapped reads:

samtools view -F 0x04 -b in.bam > out.aligned.bam

Count UNmapped reads:

samtools view -f4 -c in.bam

Require minimum mapping quality (to retain reliably mapped reads):

samtools view -q 30 -b in.bam > aligned_reads.q30.bam
samtools view -q 30 -c in.bam #to count alignments with score >30

Require match to be on the sense strand of the reference (samtools flag)

samtools view -F 16

Require match to be on antisense strand (samtools flag)

samtools view -f 16

Require at least N matches at the start of the read:

$N=6
samtools view in.bam \
| perl -lane 'next unless $F[5] =~ /^(\d+)M/;print if $1 >= $N;'

Filter by number of mismatches in BWA generated output, use BWA-specific flag:

Tag Meaning
NM     Edit distance
MD     Mismatching positions/bases
AS     Alignment score
BC     Barcode sequence
X0     Number of best hits
X1     Number of suboptimal hits found by BWA
XN     Number of ambiguous bases in the reference
XM     Number of mismatches in the alignment
XO     Number of gap opens
XG     Number of gap extentions
XT     Type: Unique/Repeat/N/Mate-sw
XA     Alternative hits; format: (chr,pos,CIGAR,NM;)*
XS     Suboptimal alignment score
XF     Support from forward/reverse alignment
XE     Number of supporting seeds

To keep only reads that map without any mismatches:

bamtools filter -tag XM:0 -in reads.bam -out reads.noMismatch.bam

Retain only uniquely mapping reads (reads with a single unambigous mapping location):

If BWA was used it is possible to use the BWA XT flag value U for unique (analogously, R is for repeat). I did not find a simple way to do this with samtools or bamtools, so grep to the rescue:

samtools view reads.bam | grep 'XT:A:U' | samtools view -bS -T referenceSequence.fa - > reads.uniqueMap.bam

However, the concept of "uniquely mapping" is not the cleanest idea - in most scenarios any given read could be placed elsewhere although it may be a lower scoring alignment. Thus, you could instead filter based on mapping quality, to retain the "reliably mapped" reads. Different mappers have different scoring models. As a rule of thumb, min values of 5 or 10 will work well. If you used bowtie/bowtie2, try:

samtools view -b -q 10 foo.bam > foo.filtered.bam
@jmf11
Copy link

jmf11 commented Sep 2, 2016

Since primary alignments only appear once and all mapped reads must have a primary alignment, can't you replace this:

samtools view -f 0x40 -F 0x4 filename.bam | cut -f1 | sort | uniq | wc -l #left mate

with:

samtools view -c -f 0x40 -F 0x904 filename.bam

This will exclude unmapped (0x4), secondary (0x100), and supplementary (0x800) alignments.

Am I right?

@davfre
Copy link
Author

davfre commented Nov 11, 2016

@jmf11: that looks very sensible! I just haven't seen these comments.. if you'd like, please make a pull request with the fix!

@davfre
Copy link
Author

davfre commented Nov 11, 2016

@cnoutsos: did you find out how to? feel free to insert a line on your solution :)

@eldariont
Copy link

I'm unsure whether this really computes the number of mapped reads:
samtools view -F 0x40 filename.bam | cut -f1 | sort | uniq | wc -l

Shouldn't it be:
samtools view -F 0x4 filename.bam | cut -f1 | sort | uniq | wc -l

To my knowledge, the 0x4 flag marks unmapped segments :-)

@Leelouh
Copy link

Leelouh commented May 8, 2017

Hi, I want to remove all the "second alignment". Do you know how I can do that?

@otradnaya
Copy link

To remove secondary alignments, you can use
samtools view -h -F 0x900 filename.bam
Explanation: remove secondary (0x100) and supplementary (0x800) alignments

@kruacademic
Copy link

hi i want to retrieve only 22 match sequence read from the bam file.can you suggest in detail?

@whiteorchid
Copy link

can you show the bwa mem command line , for use the default command didn't have the XT flag in the output bam file , great thanks!

@dpaudel
Copy link

dpaudel commented Aug 6, 2018

@whiteorchid, This might work for bwa mem

samtools view -F 4 bwamem_sample1.sam | grep -v "XA:Z" | grep -v "SA:Z" > bwamem_sample1_uniq.sam

@Temperche
Copy link

Temperche commented Feb 26, 2020

Yes! "uniquely mapping reads" = "one unambiguous mapping location". Thanks for the input, I clarified the section.
[Pardon the very late reply - I was not receiving notifications from github and only saw this now]

@davfre

bamtools filter -tag XM:0 -in reads.bam -out reads.noMismatch.bam

If i were to exclude only reads with more than 4 mismatches, how would I go about it? Does the XM tag allow for a formula like >4 instead of 0?

Also, do you know how I were to go about removing soft-clipped reads with bamtools?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment