87 unique sutta/vinaya quotes are extracted across the three posts, treating each distinct quoted passage as a unique quote (including multiple unique passages from the same sutta, e.g., three separate quotes from MN 22, three from MN 26, etc., and consolidating identical passages cited in multiple posts).
| #!/usr/bin/env typst | |
| // vim: syntax=typst | |
| // ============================================================================== | |
| // CONFIGURATION | |
| // ============================================================================== | |
| #set page( | |
| paper: "a4", |
I've been studying the Five Hindrances and compiled these discourse references that I found helpful for my own practice. I organized them this way to make sense of the topic and wanted to share in case it's useful to others.
Similes for hindrances (DN 2, SN 46.55)
- Sensual desire: like being in debt, or a bowl of water that was mixed with dye
- Ill will: like having a serious illness, or a bowl of water that was heated by fire, boiling and bubbling
- Dullness and drowsiness: like being in prison, or a bowl of water overgrown with moss and aquatic plants
- Anxiety and remorse: like being a slave, or a bowl of water stirred by the wind
- Doubt: like being lost in a dangerous desert, or a bowl of water that was cloudy, murky, and muddy, hidden in the darkness
The optimal form of government is zero government: anarchism. This is not a utopian fantasy but a pragmatic diagnosis of a fundamental flaw in all centralized systems. Wherever power is concentrated in a parasitic middleman, corruption becomes inevitable. This dynamic is famously articulated in Lord Acton's Dictum: "Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." History serves as a vast graveyard for well-intentioned leaders and revolutionary movements that, once they consolidated power, became the very tyrannies they sought to overthrow.
This corruption stems from several unavoidable truths about the state:
- Incentive Structures: Governments control vast resources, hold a monopoly on legitimate force, and can write laws that benefit specific groups. This creates an irresistible incentive for individuals to seek power not for the common good, bu
"Listen up, Kālāmas. Don't just believe something because it's a legend, don't just believe something because it's tradition, don't just believe something because it's hearsay, don't just believe something because it's in the scriptures... But Kālāmas, when you know for yourselves: 'These things are unskillful; these things are blameworthy; these things are criticized by the wise; these things, if you practice and accept them, will lead to harm and suffering,' then, Kālāmas, you should abandon them."
– The Buddha, Kālāma Sutta (AN 3.65)
Answer:
Yes if they have right view and are all-out practicing the noble eightfold path. Then identity won't matter
Believe in your own agency (not some external supreme creator god) and believe in the four noble truth should be a good start for right view. When you have faith in these axioms then it's natural to also have faith in the Buddha himself and the efficacy of his path. And when you have faith, you'll naturally respect his instructions and will strive to keep the precepts as unblemished as possible. There's no right meditation without the strong foundation of right view and virtue (ethics, morality, good habits, etc.)
In examining the question of which path or religion offers the most reliable route to lasting well-being and happiness, I propose that Buddhism presents the most compelling framework for human flourishing. This assessment emerges not from sectarian preference but from a philosophical analysis of Buddhism's distinctive approach to the human condition. Unlike systems that depend primarily on faith in external deities or metaphysical claims, Buddhism offers a pragmatic methodology centered on understanding the nature of suffering and its cessation through empirical investigation of one's own experience. The Buddha himself encouraged followers to "come and see" (ehipassiko) rather than accept teachings on blind faith, establishing a tradition that aligns remarkably well with contemporary understandings o
As a new developer joining the team on February 05, 2025, I'm tasked with quickly understanding and contributing to a large Go monorepo, estimated at 1 million lines of code. This presents a significant onboarding challenge. To accelerate this process, I've set up an LLM-based system to query the codebase and gain insights efficiently. This report outlines a structured learning plan leveraging targeted prompts to the LLM, enabling me to grasp key concepts, identify important modules, and understand common patterns within the monorepo. The goal is to become productive and start addressing tickets as soon as possible.
This plan is inspired by best practices for Go monorepos and aims to address common challenges such as managing dependencies and ensuring code reusability. The prompts are designed to extract information about
- Where: Machine Learning (training neural networks, linear/logistic regression).
- Why:
- Simplicity: Easy to implement for differentiable objectives.
- Scalability: Stochastic variants (SGD) handle large datasets.
- Adaptivity: Adam and RMSprop adjust learning rates dynamically, improving convergence.