A comprehensive quality checklist for high-quality open source Elixir modules. Use this checklist to evaluate and ensure your Elixir packages meet professional standards.
- Comprehensive CI pipeline that runs on every PR and push to main
- Multi-version testing matrix (test against multiple Elixir/OTP versions)
- Automated formatting check (
mix format --check-formatted
) - Dependency audit (
mix deps.unlock --check-unused
) - Test coverage reporting with GitHub integration (
mix coveralls.github
) - Proper caching for dependencies and build artifacts
- Security scanning for dependencies and code
- Manual workflow dispatch option for maintainers
- Automated dependency updates with weekly schedule
- Proper PR limits (e.g., max 10 open PRs)
- Consistent labeling (dependencies, elixir tags)
- Semantic commit messages with scope prefixes
- Clear repository description and topics/tags
- Comprehensive README.md (see README section below)
- Contributing guidelines (
CONTRIBUTING.md
) - Issue templates for bugs and features only
- Pull request template with checklist
- Semantic versioning with clear version strategy
- Complete project description and source URL
- Proper Elixir version constraint (e.g.,
~> 1.17
) - Correct license specification (Apache-2.0, MIT, etc.)
- Homepage and documentation URLs configured
- Complete package metadata with maintainers
- Appropriate files list (lib, mix.exs, README, LICENSE)
- Relevant links (GitHub, docs, related projects)
- Descriptive package summary
- Production dependencies properly versioned with
~>
- Splode for error handling (
{:splode, "~> 0.2"}
) - Complete dev/test toolchain:
-
credo
for static analysis -
dialyxir
for type checking -
doctor
for documentation coverage -
ex_doc
for documentation generation -
excoveralls
for test coverage -
expublish
for release management -
mix_test_watch
for development -
quokka
for advanced formatting and code quality - Property testing with
stream_data
- Mocking with
mimic
(test only)
-
- Quality command (
mix q
ormix quality
) that runs:- Code formatting
- Format verification
- Compilation with warnings as errors
- Dialyzer type checking
- Credo static analysis
- Documentation command (
mix docs
) with browser opening - Test configuration that excludes flaky tests by default
- Coverage thresholds defined (aim for >90%)
- Quality badges showing:
- Hex.pm version
- Documentation link
- CI status
- License
- Test coverage
- Clear project description and value proposition
- Installation instructions with version specification
- Quick start guide with runnable examples
- Core concepts explanation
- Comprehensive usage examples
- API reference links
- Contributing guidelines reference
- License information
- Related projects and ecosystem links
- Complete @moduledoc for every public module
- @doc strings for all public functions
- @spec type specifications for public APIs
- @typedoc for custom types
- Doctests for simple examples
- Usage examples in documentation
- Error condition documentation
- Parameter and return value descriptions
- Getting started guide for new users
- Advanced usage guides for complex features
- Architecture documentation explaining design decisions
- Module map showing all modules and their purposes
- API reference generated from code
- Changelog with semantic versioning
- Migration guides between major versions
- Consistent formatting with
mix format
- Snake_case for functions and variables
- PascalCase for modules
- Descriptive naming that explains intent
- Pattern matching preferred over conditionals
- Function heads for different argument patterns
- Tagged tuples for return values (
{:ok, result}
|{:error, reason}
)
- Splode for error handling - consistent error structs and utilities
- Specific error types for different failure modes
-
with
statements for complex operations - No silent failures - all errors are handled or propagated
- Documented error conditions in function specs
- Minimal exception usage - prefer tagged tuples
- Dialyzer passes with zero warnings
- Complete @spec definitions for public functions
- Custom types defined with @type
- Struct definitions using TypedStruct when appropriate
- NimbleOptions for configuration validation
- Appropriate data structures for use cases
- Efficient algorithms with documented complexity
- Resource cleanup in all code paths
- Memory usage consideration for long-running processes
- Timeout handling for external operations
- Benchmarking for performance-critical code
- High test coverage (>90% line coverage)
- Branch coverage for conditional logic
- Edge case testing including error conditions
- Property-based testing for complex logic
- Integration tests for system behavior
- Performance tests for critical paths
- Clear test structure mirroring lib directory
- Descriptive test names explaining what's being tested
- Grouped tests using
describe
blocks - Test helpers in support directory
- Async tests where possible for speed
- Proper test isolation with clean setup/teardown
- Both success and failure paths tested
- Mock usage appropriate and minimal
- Test data factories for complex structures
- Flaky test management with proper tagging
- Test documentation for complex test scenarios
- No secrets in code or documentation
- Dependency vulnerability scanning
- Input validation for all public APIs
- Safe string interpolation
- Clear license (Apache-2.0, MIT, etc.)
- License headers where required
- Copyright attribution proper
- Dependency license compatibility
- Contributor agreements if needed
- GitHub Action for Hex publishing with manual workflow dispatch
- Automated version bumping (major/minor/patch) via workflow input
- Automatic changelog updates with release notes
- Quality gate enforcement (tests, format, dialyzer, credo before release)
- Git tagging and GitHub releases automatically created
- Documentation regeneration as part of release process
- Semantic versioning (MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH)
- Changelog maintenance with each release
- Git tagging for releases
- Release notes for major changes
- Breaking change documentation
- Hex.pm publication with proper metadata
- Documentation publishing to HexDocs
- Package verification before release
- Release automation via GitHub Actions
- Clear contribution guidelines
- Code review process documented
- Issue templates for different types
- PR templates with checklists
- Welcoming tone for new contributors
- Active maintenance with regular updates
- Issue response time commitments
- Deprecation strategy for breaking changes
- Long-term support policy
- Successor planning if needed
- Telemetry integration for metrics
- Structured logging throughout application
- Health checks for services
- Monitoring guidelines in documentation
- Live reloading support for development
- Development scripts and helpers
- Debugging guides and tools
- OTP application structure when appropriate
- Supervision tree design documented
Excellent (90-100%): Production-ready, professional-grade package
Good (80-89%): High quality with minor improvements needed
Fair (70-79%): Functional but needs significant quality improvements
Poor (<70%): Not ready for production use
This checklist is based on the jido_signal package, which demonstrates most of these best practices in action. Use it as a reference implementation for quality standards.
- Self-assessment: Use this checklist to evaluate your own packages
- Code review: Reference specific items during PR reviews
- Project planning: Use as acceptance criteria for new packages
- Learning guide: Each item represents a skill to develop
- Quality gate: Require 85%+ compliance before production release
This checklist should be updated as the Elixir ecosystem evolves and new best practices emerge.