-
-
Save mwotton/6148426 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
typedef struct { | |
int girlfriend; | |
} holder; | |
typedef struct { | |
holder a; | |
} toplevel; | |
typedef struct { | |
int this; | |
} yoda; | |
int main() { | |
holder holder = { 2 }; | |
yoda understand = { 2 }; | |
toplevel get = {holder}; | |
int you = 2; | |
/* whee, i made this stupid code work! */ | |
if (you == understand.this) { | |
get.a.girlfriend; | |
} | |
return 0; | |
} |
/* You "class" */
function You() {
this.understanding = ['some-bullshit-pseudocode', 'axe-being-terrible'];
}
You.prototype.understand = function (wat) {
return this.understanding.indexOf(wat) !== -1;
};
/* Girlfriend "class" */
function Girlfriend() {}
Girlfriend.prototype.get = function () {
alert('lolol u smell like a 14 year-old');
};
/* Main shit */
function init() {
var you = new You();
var thisBullshit = 'some-bullshit-pseudocode';
if (you.understand(thisBullshit)) {
var girlfriend = new Girlfriend();
girlfriend.get();
}
}
init();
(not written by me, thank @BellendSebastian)
It is worth noting (for extreme values of "worth") that this snippet is also valid (though pointless) brainfuck syntax.
coffeescript!
you = understand: (that) => this is that
get = a: girlfriend: -> alert 'You suck Unilever!'
do get.a.girlfriend if you.understand this
I'm married. Fuck you all. totters off
#!/bin/bash
you="bleh.blah"
understand="bleh"
this="blah"
get="echo "
a="You suck,"
girlfriend=" Unilever"
if [ ${you} == "${understand}.${this}" ]; then
${get}${a}${girlfriend};
fi
Brainfuck:
+++
+++++
++[>+
>+++>
+++++
++>++
+++ +++ ++<<< <-]>>
>>-----------.+++++++
+++++++++++++++.++++++.<
<++.>>--.++.------------
------.++++++++.<<.>+++
++++++++++++.>+++.----
-.+++.-------.+++++
++If++you++understand++this+;+get+a+girlfriend.
<+++++++++++++
+++.>----.<<+.
@sgerrand re: first ruby example, I believe idea was to make parse/compile, not to output obscenities for some ad agency. :)
PHP - Live Test 5.0.0 - 5.5.1
Issues
try {
if ($you = new Understand(new You())) {
$you->get()->a()->girlFriend(new Her());
}
} catch ( NullBabeException $e ) {
echo $e->getMessage();
}
Classes
abstract class Person {
abstract public function name();
function __toString() {
return $this->name();
}
}
class Her extends Person {
public function name() {
return "girlFriend";
}
}
class You extends Person {
public function name() {
return "you";
}
}
class Understand {
private $y, $i;
function __construct(Person $y) {
$this->y = $y;
$this->i = "";
}
function a() {
return new What($this->y, $this->i);
}
function get() {
while ( $x = mt_rand(0, 5) ) {
$this->i .= $x;
}
return $this;
}
}
class What {
private $i, $y;
function __construct(Person $y, $i) {
$this->i = $i;
$this->y = $y;
}
function girlFriend(Person $her) {
throw new NullBabeException(sprintf("%s is Needed ASAP Found %s issues with %s ",
$her, number_format(( int ) $this->i), $this->y), E_CORE_WARNING);
}
}
Exceptions
class NullBabeException extends Exception {
function __construct($m) {
parent::__construct(sprintf("<h1>%s</h1>", $m));
}
}
#!/usr/bin/env python
import this
# ;_; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9pEzgHorH0
class Person(object):
def understand(self, concept):
assert concept
return concept
def get(self):
return self
you = Person()
girlfriend = Person()
if __name__ == '__main__':
if you.understand(this):
girlfriend.get()
orf's python doesn't reach the if block, thus my version:
class a: __cmp__ = lambda *a: 0
class b(object): __getattribute__ = lambda *a: b()
you = a()
understand = get = b()
if you == understand.this:
get.a.girlfriend
Didn't actually read his before I wrote mine. That feeling when someone already had your idea... head → wall
And because I didn't like the mass definition of structs, here's my C version (for which I had to modify the syntax slightly):
int main() {
union bar {
void* this;
union bar* a;
void* girlfriend;
} get;
void* you = get.a = &get;
union bar understand;
understand.a = get.a;
if (you == understand.this) {
get.a->girlfriend;
}
return 0;
}
Only 8th grade boys like the smell of Axe. The irony is that 8th grade girls think the boys who like it are idiots. So if you want a girlfriend, you;re better off with Old Spice.
#!/usr/bin/perl
=head1 NAME
douchebag.pl - douchebaggery implemented in Perl
=head1 SYNOPSIS
$ perl douchebag.pl
=head1 DESCRIPTION
douchebag.pl is precisely what it says on the tin.
=head1 COPYRIGHT
Copyright (C) 2013 Apreten Tiousass Wipe
douchebag.pl may be used and/or redistributed under the same terms as Perl itself.
=cut
sub get_a {
my ($object_to_get, @args) = @_;
if ($object_to_get eq "girlfriend") {
return 0;
} else {
return 1;
}
}
sub you_understand {
my $subject = shift;
return 1;
}
my $this = "perl";
if (you_understand($this)) {
get_a("girlfriend");
}
re: first ruby example, I believe idea was to make parse/compile, not to output obscenities for some ad agency. :)
My point was that it didn't compile. 😉
jplitza: ooh, i like that one, but changing the Axe code to be less stupid is a definite no-no.
It compiled and ran successfully, both on my machine and in the REPL output you posted.
Common Lisp
* (let* ((you 1) (understand.this 1) (get.a.girlfriend "HODOR!"))
(progn
(defmacro custom-if (func if-form block-start result block-end)
(list `,func `(,(cadr if-form) ,(car if-form) ,(caddr if-form)) result))
(setf (symbol-function '==) (function =)))
(custom-if
if (you == understand.this) {
get.a.girlfriend;
}
))
"HODOR!"
@pranavrc All the props.
yes, I think @pranavrc wins this thread with that one, macro-to-the-max!
Instead of trying to defend original code I'll propose how it should actually look to make sense:
if (you.understand(this)){
you.get_a_girlfriend();
}
Here's my python version: