It’s also worth remembering that, while “gender critical” people talk about how the Forstater judgement means their beliefs are “legally protected”, the actual text of the judgement is not that flattering to them:
A philosophical belief would only be excluded for failing to satisfy Grainger V if it was the kind of belief the expression of which would be akin to Nazism or totalitarianism and thereby liable to be excluded from the protection of rights under Articles 9 and 10 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) by virtue of [Article 17](https://en.wikipedia.