endolith

ּ_בּ
בּ_בּ
טּ_טּ
כּ‗כּ
לּ_לּ
מּ_מּ
סּ_סּ
תּ_תּ
٩(×̯×)۶
٩(̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾)۶

retronym

class A
class A2 extends A
class B

trait M[X]

//
// Upper Type Bound
//
def upperTypeBound[AA <: A](x: AA): A = x

jamiew

easterEgg.BadWorder.list={
"4r5e":1,
"5h1t":1,
"5hit":1,
a55:1,
anal:1,
anus:1,
ar5e:1,
arrse:1,
arse:1,

lucasrizoli

<
%3C
&lt
&lt;
&LT
&LT;
&#60
&#060
&#0060
&#00060

newhouseb

The basic idea here is to substantiate the claims made by this square post:
http://corner.squareup.com/2011/06/postgresql-data-is-important.html

In PostgreSQL, and MySQL (MyISAM and InnoDB) I create millions of rows and then add 
and remove columns and add and remove indexes.  For columns without defaults this is
basically free in PostgreSQL and O(n) in MySQL.  For adding indexes its at best O(n) 
everywhere, but with PostgreSQL it claims not to do any locking that would otherwise
prevent table interaction.

Also, PostgreSQL has _awsome_ documentation (it has real examples!). I always get 

jashkenas

For those folks not already hanging out in #documentcloud... here's the log of this afternoon's Ember/Backbone politics discussion.

12:21 PM <wycats> jashkenas: hey
12:21 PM <wycats> jashkenas: I'm sorry
12:21 PM <wycats> how would you like me to describe backbone?
12:21 PM <wycats> let's work this out for once and for all :)
12:21 PM <wycats> I'm definitely not intentionally saying incorrect things about backbone
12:22 PM • knowtheory gets out popcorn
12:24 PM <jashkenas> don't worry about it too much -- I'm just not terribly pleased with backbone being continued to be used as the strawman...
12:24 PM <wycats> jashkenas: I am worried about it a lot

jlong

var parser = document.createElement('a');
parser.href = "http://example.com:3000/pathname/?search=test#hash";

parser.protocol; // => "http:"
parser.hostname; // => "example.com"
parser.port;     // => "3000"
parser.pathname; // => "/pathname/"
parser.search;   // => "?search=test"
parser.hash;     // => "#hash"
parser.host;     // => "example.com:3000"

nijikokun

  var user = {
    validateCredentials: function (username, password) {
      return (
          (!(username += '') || username === '') ? { error: "No Username Given.", field: 'name' }
        : (!(username += '') || password === '') ? { error: "No Password Given.", field: 'pass' }
        : (username.length < 3)                  ? { error: "Username is less than 3 Characters.", field: 'name' }
        : (password.length < 4)                  ? { error: "Password is less than 4 Characters.", field: 'pass' }
        : (!/^([a-z0-9_-]+)$/i.test(username))   ? { error: "Username contains invalid characters.", field: 'name' }
        : false
      );

jonathanmoore

Share Counts

I have always struggled with getting all the various share buttons from Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, Pinterest, etc to align correctly and to not look like a tacky explosion of buttons. Seeing a number of sites rolling their own share buttons with counts, for example The Next Web I decided to look into the various APIs on how to simply return the share count.

If you want to roll up all of these into a single jQuery plugin check out Sharrre

Many of these API calls and methods are undocumented, so anticipate that they will change in the future. Also, if you are planning on rolling these out across a site I would recommend creating a simple endpoint that periodically caches results from all of the APIs so that you are not overloading the services will requests.

Twitter

jeroenr

namespace :deploy do

   task :restart do
     stop
     sleep 1
     start
   end

   task :start do
     targets = find_servers_for_task(current_task)