arewexlibreyet.md

Are we XLibre yet?

X11 has been, and still is, a vital piece of technology at the core of professional Unix-like workstations since decades. It has a proven track record of supporting enterprise-grade applications with long-term protocol stability and platform compatibility. It has matured over decades. XLibre is an actively developed fork of the X.Org X11 server, initiated by the most active X.Org developer and supported by the open source community.

An incompatible alternative, Wayland, is being aggressively pushed by IBM = Red Hat = Gnome = Fedora = freedesktop.org. However, it is not ready to succeed X11 as it its governance model leads to never-ending discussions and prevents even the most essential functionality from existing. Think twice before abandoning Xorg. Wayland breaks everything!

It is time that the open source community reclaims what was ours to begin with. This page lists distributions supporting XLibre so that you can make an informed choice.

--> Table has moved to https://github.com/X11Libre/xserver/wiki/Are-We-XLibre-Yet%3F <--

I'd suggest splitting "No support" category into one where the maintainers do the "wait and see approach" or are waiting for Xlibre to reach certain technical milestones, and the one for hostile distros for no reason (other than political one) like alpine or antix, where the technical reasons are just an excuse to not include it.

I could do that myself, but I don't have enough time to do it.

[...] or antix, where the technical reasons are just an excuse to not include it.

You meant NixOS, no?

I'd suggest splitting "No support" category into one where the maintainers do the "wait and see approach" or are waiting for Xlibre to reach certain technical milestones, and the one for hostile distros for no reason (other than political one) like alpine or antix, where the technical reasons are just an excuse to not include it.

There is already the distinction between "wait and see" found under the heading "Unclear" and the "No support" section with the introduction:

The maintainers of the distribution expressed concerns about packaging XLibre, do not want to add it or removed X11.

To me this is all what is interesting for the XLibre users. If one further likes to drill down for the reasons there is the "Remarks" column in each table.

you can have xorg until 2036 with ubuntu 24.04

And by 2036, Wayland will be deemed "too old" and they will write an incompatible "Wayland 2" which is more restrictive. Mark my words. Just look at Gtk.

you can have xorg until 2036 with ubuntu 24.04

And by 2036, Wayland will be deemed "too old" and they will write an incompatible "Wayland 2" which is more restrictive. Mark my words. Just look at Gtk.

No, by that time we'll have DirectFBX which will replace X and Wayland both, incorporate uwuisms, have My Little Pony as a mascot, and run off libbronie exclusively.

you can have xorg until 2036 with ubuntu 24.04

And by 2036, Wayland will be deemed "too old" and they will write an incompatible "Wayland 2" which is more restrictive. Mark my words. Just look at Gtk.

i hope you are wrong , cause wayland is already way tooo much restrictive...

you can have xorg until 2036 with ubuntu 24.04

And by 2036, Wayland will be deemed "too old" and they will write an incompatible "Wayland 2" which is more restrictive. Mark my words. Just look at Gtk.

No, by that time we'll have DirectFBX which will replace X and Wayland both, incorporate uwuisms, have My Little Pony as a mascot, and run off libbronie exclusively.

so a display server made by people with unstable mental health and infected by the woke mind virus ?

if you are right, then xlibre is the only place for mentally stable and unawake people ...