Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@robertpi
robertpi / gist:2964793
Created June 21, 2012 09:18
F# record implementing an interface
namespace MyNamespace
type IMyInterface =
abstract GetValue: unit -> string
type MyRecord =
{ MyField1: int
MyField2: string }
interface IMyInterface with
member x.GetValue() = x.MyField2
@DotNetNerd
DotNetNerd / CLIMutable
Created May 8, 2013 07:33
Using F# CLIMutable and ImpromptuInterface.FSharp with Dapper
[<CLIMutable>]
type Person = { Name : string; Age : int }
//Nuget: ImpromptuInterface.FSharp
use conn = new SqlCeConnection("Data Source=C:\Databases\MyDB.sdf;Persist Security Info=False;")
conn.Open()
let result =
conn.Query("SELECT * FROM People")
@vbfox
vbfox / Dapper.fs
Last active April 21, 2022 02:58
Minimal dapper in F#
module DapperFSharp =
open System.Data.SqlClient
open System.Dynamic
open System.Collections.Generic
open Dapper
let dapperQuery<'Result> (query:string) (connection:SqlConnection) =
connection.Query<'Result>(query)
let dapperParametrizedQuery<'Result> (query:string) (param:obj) (connection:SqlConnection) : 'Result seq =
@mrange
mrange / pipeline_performance.md
Last active May 10, 2021 13:34
Performance comparison of different data pipelines in .NET

Performance comparison of different data pipelines in .NET

Full source code can be found here

Changelog

  1. 2016-12-20
  2. New performance test - Paul Westcott (@manofstick) made me aware that SeqComposer has a more performant API. SeqComposer2 uses this API.
  3. 2016-12-23
@mrange
mrange / data_performance.md
Last active January 4, 2020 10:16
On the topic of data locality and performance

On the topic of data locality and performance

Full source code can be found here

It is well-known that a hard disk has a long delay from that we request the data to that we get the data. Usually we measure the hard disk latency in milliseconds which is an eternity for a CPU. The bandwidth of a hard disk is decent good as SSD:s today can reach 1 GiB/second.

What is less known is that RAM has the same characteristics, bad latency with good bandwidth.

You can measure RAM latency and badndwidth using Intel® Memory Latency Checker. On my machine the RAM latency under semi-high load is ~120 ns (The 3r:1w bandwidth is 16GiB/second). This means that the CPU on my machine has to wait for ~400 cycles for data, an eternity.

@mrange
mrange / 2d_performance.md
Last active January 30, 2017 16:26
On the topic of 2D array performance in .NET

On the topic of 2D array performance in .NET

Full source code can be found here

It popped up a discussion in FSSF Slack over 2D arrays and performance. I thought it could be good to share some performance numbers for different alternatives in .NET.

For this I am computing the matrix product:

let naiveMultiply () =
@swlaschin
swlaschin / ndclondon17_fp_track.md
Last active July 10, 2017 11:04
Functional Track talks from NDC London 2017

Functional Track talks from NDC London 2017

Also, here is the list of all videos from NDC London 2017:

Wednesday 2017-01-18

@swlaschin
swlaschin / ndcoslo17_fp_track.md
Created July 5, 2017 19:38
Functional Track talks from NDC Oslo 2017

Functional Track talks from NDC Oslo 2017

Also, here is the list of all videos from NDC Oslo 2017:

Wednesday 2017-06-14

Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.