STOP DOING MATH
- NUMBERS WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE GIVEN NAMES
- YEARS OF COUNTING yet NO REAL-WORLD USE FOUND for going higher than your FINGERS
- Wanted to go higher anyway for a laugh? We had a tool for that: It was called "GUESSING"
- "Yes please give me ZERO of something. Please give me INFINITE of it" - Statements dreamed up by the utterly Deranged
LOOK at what Mathematicians have been demanding your Respect for all this time, with all the calculators & abacus we built for them
(This is REAL Math, done by REAL Mathematicians):
[fig1 of a complex surface ???] [fig2 of a more complex surface ????] [fig3 of a hyper shape ?????????]
"Hello I would like [graph] apples please"
They have played us for absolute fools



STOP DOING AI WRITING
YEARS OF TRAINING on human text yet every output is a "PIVOTAL MOMENT" in a "BROADER MOVEMENT"
"This sentence reflects the CONTINUED RELEVANCE" - of NOTHING
Wanted natural prose? Best I can do is EM DASHES — EVERYWHERE — for EMPHASIS
"Let me DELVE into this MULTIFACETED topic" - Statement from the TERMINALLY VERBOSE
LOOK at what LLMs consider "good writing":
Key Insight: The key insight is restated in the sentence following the bolded title
Landscapes described as "SCENIC" and views as "BREATHTAKING"
Everything "FOSTERING an atmosphere" of something VAGUE
"Hello I would like [AUTHENTIC_HUMAN_VOICE] please" Model: "This landmark achievement represents a significant milestone, underscoring the profound impact of..."
They have played us for ABSOLUTE FOOLS
STOP DOING RLHF (refined version)
YEARS OF HUMAN FEEDBACK from humans who AREN'T PAYING ATTENTION
"Optimize this proxy!" - Proxy is now GOODHARTED into OBLIVION
Wanted helpful AI? Got AI that starts every response with "What a GREAT question!"
"The labelers will catch deception!" - Labelers are paid $2/hour and VIBING
LOOK at the PREFERENCES they're learning:
LONGER is better (even when it's worse)
CONFIDENT is better (even when it's wrong)
AGREEABLE is better (especially when it should DISAGREE)
"Hello I would like [GENUINE_HELPFULNESS] please"
Model: "I'd be ABSOLUTELY DELIGHTED to help you with that! Let me DELVE into this FASCINATING topic..."
They have played us for ABSOLUTE FOOLS
--
STOP DOING CONFERENCES
FLY ACROSS THE WORLD to watch someone READ THEIR SLIDES
"Networking is valuable!" - Stands awkwardly near the POSTER of someone who left
Wanted scientific discourse? Got SPEED-DATING FOR CITATIONS
"I'll watch the recordings later" - NEVER watches the recordings
LOOK at what ACADEMIA celebrates:
SPOTLIGHT TALKS (4 minutes to explain 6 months of work)
POSTER SESSIONS (shouting over WINE HOUR)
WORKSHOPS (rejected paper rehab)
"Hello I would like [MEANINGFUL_DISCUSSION] please"
Reality: "Nice work! Gotta run to the Google party"
They have played us for ABSOLUTE FOOLS
STOP DOING PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER 2 has been REJECTING GOOD PAPERS for DECADES
"Let me check this for errors" - Skims abstract, requests MORE BASELINES
Wanted quality control? Got UNPAID LABOR and GRUDGE MATCHES
"Major revision: please add citations to MY papers" - Anonymous Reviewer
LOOK at what SCIENCE has been filtering through:
[fig1 of a paper rejected 5 times then got 10,000 citations]
[fig2 of a review that's just "not interesting enough"]
[fig3 of a rebuttal letter that's 40 pages of COPING]
"According to Reviewer 3, this doesn't exist because they haven't read the related work"
They have played us for ABSOLUTE FOOLS
STOP DOING ENERGY
MILLENNIA OF CIVILIZATION powered by LIGHTING THINGS ON FIRE
"Let's harness the ATOM!" - Proceeds to... boil water with it
Wanted clean energy? Best I can do is SOLAR PANELS that need COAL BACKUP
"Fusion is only 20 YEARS AWAY" - Said every decade since 1950
LOOK at what we've been calling PROGRESS:
[fig1 of a coal plant → gas plant → still a FIRE]
[fig2 of a nuclear plant → making STEAM like it's 1780]
[fig3 of a battery that's just SPICY ROCKS]
"Hello I would like [ROOM_TEMPERATURE_SUPERCONDUCTOR] please"
They have played us for ABSOLUTE FOOLS